As the first year since Barack Obama’s election as president passes into history, it is worthwhile to read (or reread) and reflect on his “Dreams from My Father,” which was first published in 1995, when he was 33 years old. In his preface to the 2004 edition—only a scant five years ago, when the book was republished—he does not disavow or even soften his often-harsh sentiments at all. However, he does mention that his mother died of cancer right after the book was first published; and in retrospect, he might not have written the same book about an “absent parent,” his father, but instead might have celebrated her life.[2] He loved her, and writes: “[S]he was the kindest, most generous spirit I have ever known, and . . . what is best in me I owe to her.”[3]
The book is still relevant and instructive today because it provides a window into his core beliefs—unfiltered by aides or the pandering to voters that so often takes place when a politician is running for public office. These core beliefs came into being many years before we heard his name or knew how to pronounce it; and they are being reflected in his actions and policies that affect each of us. Also, the book warrants a careful reexamination at this juncture in his presidency, when a growing number of Americans are having second thoughts or “buyers’ remorse” about the man in the White House.
Barack Obama is not his Kenyan father, nor his mother. Perhaps he comes closest to being his maternal grandparents, “Toot” and “Gramps.” They loved him dearly and nourished him when he was growing up as a “half-breed”—his term, not mine[4]—caught between two cultures, one white and the other non-white. He writes lovingly about his grandparents: “They had sacrificed again and again for me. They had poured all their lingering hopes into my success. Never had they given me reason to doubt their love; I doubted if they ever would.”[5] Later, he would write: “I looked out the window, thinking about my mother, Toot, and Gramps, and how grateful I was to them—for who they were. . . .”[6]
Because of his looks and not his parentage or lineage, he made a conscious decision to be black. Once he made it, he seemed to put the white world behind him and to identify with the “victimization” of blacks. For example, he writes: “[T]o admit our doubt and confusion to whites, to open up our psyches to general examination by those who had caused so much of the damage in the first place, seemed ludicrous, itself an expression of self-hatred—for there seemed no reason to expect that whites would look at our private struggles as a mirror into their own souls, rather than yet more evidence of black pathology.”[7] In these and other similar statements, he evidenced how far he had traveled from the white world of his mother and her parents who raised him.
The transformation seems to have started when young “Barry” Obama returned to Hawaii from Indonesia, where he had been living with his mother and her second husband, to live with her parents and enroll at Honolulu’s elite, ethnically and culturally diverse Punahou School—where his sense that he “didn’t belong continued to grow.”[8] He began hanging around and identifying with the few black Punahou students and other black teenagers “whose confusion and anger would help shape [his] own.”[9] He writes about loneliness that made him want to run “back into the sort of pain a boy could understand,”[10] and he speaks about “the sense of abandonment [he’d] felt as a boy.”[11] Also, he writes that he was “trying to raise [himself] to be a black man in America,”[12] and “living out a caricature of black male adolescence, itself a caricature of swaggering American manhood.”[13]
It was during this time that he developed a “ledger of slights.”[14] He adds: “I learned to slip back and forth between my black and white worlds, understanding that each possessed its own language and customs and structures of meaning, convinced that with a bit of translation on my part the two worlds would eventually cohere.”[15] Still at Punahou, he would recall: “[T]he only thing you could choose as your own was withdrawal into a smaller and smaller coil of rage, until being black meant only the knowledge of your own powerlessness, of your own defeat. And the final irony: Should you refuse this defeat and lash out at your captors, they would have a name for that, too, a name that could cage you just as good. Paranoid. Militant. Violent. Nigger.”[16]
One wonders whether on some level Obama thought in those terms about the whites who made his future successes possible? If not, why was he choosing to identify so much with the “victimization” of blacks and with anti-white feelings? Is that the anger he “inherited” from his Kenyan father with multiple wives, who was a stern disciplinarian and loved him so much that the father spent only one month of his life with young Barry when he was 10 years old[17], and effectively abandoned him the rest of the time? In his own words, he reflects on his feelings as that 10-year-old when his father visited Hawaii: “I began to count the days until my father would leave and things would return to normal.”[18] Also, he acknowledges his anger.[19]
Later, in Kenya, he realizes what his life might have been like when he views a photo album of his father’s third wife and their family. “They were happy scenes, all of them, and all strangely familiar, as if I were glimpsing some alternative universe that had played itself out behind my back. . . . Here it was, I thought, what might have been. And the recognition of how wrong it had all turned out . . . made me so sad that after only a few minutes I had to look away.”[20] However, he expresses great love for his father too, and places him on a pedestal at times[21]—and there is mention of the fact that his father was highly educated, generous and never held a grudge.[22] There is no claim or insinuation that his father was a racist; and his mother certainly was not a racist.[23]
At Occidental College in Los Angeles, Obama hung out with blacks too[24], but seemed to mellow somewhat. He writes: “I had stumbled upon one of the well-kept secrets about black people: that most of us weren’t interested in revolt; that most of us were tired of thinking about race all the time. . . .”[25] In writing about a young multiracial student named Joyce, he quotes her as saying: “It’s not white people who are making me choose. Maybe it used to be that way, but now they’re willing to treat me like a person. No—it’s black people who always have to make everything racial. They’re the ones making me choose.”[26] Yet, Obama rejects her beliefs, and allies himself with others who are “alienated.”[27] He seems to mellow somewhat again by admitting: “My identity might begin with the fact of my race, but it didn’t, couldn’t, end there.”[28]
When he arrived in New York City to attend Columbia University, he became “Barack” as opposed to “Barry,”[29] and he asked rhetorically: “Where do I belong?”[30] Also, he asked: “Did any of us [know where we belonged]? Where were the fathers, the uncles and grandfathers, who could help explain this gash in our hearts?”[31] Leaving a theater in New York with his mother and half-sister Maya, he observed: “The emotions between the races could never be pure. . . . Whether we sought out our demons or salvation, the other race would always remain just that: menacing, alien, and apart.”[32] Later, in writing about his times in Chicago and the stories he had heard from the black leadership, Obama says: “They had arisen out of a very particular experience with hate. That hate hadn’t gone away; it formed a counternarrative buried deep within each person and at the center of which stood white people—some cruel, some ignorant, sometimes a single face, sometimes just a faceless image of a system claiming power over our lives.”[33]
Yet, as he was about to embark on his life in Chicago (before attending law school), he reflected: “[T]his community I imagined was still in the making, built on the promise that the larger American community, black, white, and brown, could somehow redefine itself—I believed that it might, over time, admit the uniqueness of my own life.”[34] And it has, as our first non-white American president. While commenting on his work in Chicago, however, he concludes: “If [black] nationalism could create a strong and effective insularity, deliver on its promise of self-respect, then the hurt it might cause well-meaning whites, or the inner turmoil it caused people like me, would be of little consequence.”[35] In discussing the difficulties facing black businesses, he mentions “the leg up that your [white] competitors possessed after having kept you out of the game for over three hundred years”[36]—again, the issue of black victimization.
What is perhaps most striking is that he never expounds on any religious beliefs or spirituality, much less a belief in God. However, the book spans so much of his life—and his formative years—and deals with almost every other subject imaginable that one could think or write about. Perhaps the closest he comes to dealing with the subject may be reflected in the following comments: “I remained a reluctant skeptic, doubtful of my own motives, wary of expedient conversion, having too many quarrels with God to accept a salvation too easily won.”[37] Also, when he and his Kenyan half-sister Auma are on a safari, he listens to their Kikuyu driver sing a hymn at night while Obama is walking back to his tent, and he writes: “I felt I understood Francis’s plaintive song, imagining it transmitting upward, through the clear black night, directly to God.”[38] One is left to wonder about his beliefs, and whether his attendance at churches in subsequent years may be for political reasons, and calculated, which is true of many politicians.
Other issues raised in the book include:
- What would have become of Obama’s life if he had gotten hooked on the illegal drugs he was taking? For example, he writes: “Junkie. Pothead. That’s where I’d been headed: the final, fatal role of the young would-be black man.”[39]
- To what extent has he has been successful at anything other than writing, speaking, campaigning, politics and getting elected—being a professional politician? For example, the book evidences few significant accomplishments as a “community organizer.” Indeed, he writes: “When classmates in college asked me just what it was that a community organizer did, I couldn’t answer them directly. Instead, I’d pronounce on the need for change. Change in the White House, where Reagan and his minions were carrying on their dirty deeds. Change in the Congress, compliant and corrupt.”[40] Also, he accomplished nothing memorable in the U.S. Senate during the short time he was actually there.
- How his socialist and anti-capitalist views are reshaping America, and the damage that may result? His biases are reflected in the book. For example, in New York City before he moved to Chicago for the first time, he went to work as a research assistant at a consulting house to multinational corporations, where he recalled feeling like “a spy behind enemy lines.”[41] That spy effectively “owns” General Motors, Chrysler and major American banks and other business entities; and he has not hesitated to dictate to them—including that GM’s CEO be removed and what cars the company is to make in the future. History is replete with the names of other world leaders who have tried to run areas of economic and societal activity, without having any knowledge[42], and they have failed.
- How to address the sense of black victimization that is reflected in so much of his book? For example, by way of contrasting the attitudes of various American minority groups including Asians, he cites a black man who says: “I guess we worked so long for nothing, we feel like we shouldn’t have to break our backs just to survive. That’s what we tell our children anyway.”[43]
- Whom will Obama blame if his popularity fades (e.g., because of perceived narcissistic arrogance and incompetence) and his presidency fails? Since he and his party control the White House and Congress, the buck stops with him; and sooner or later, he may come to be viewed by a majority of Americans as the problem, not the solution. Will he handle his descent from “Mount Olympus” gracefully, or will his fall from grace be a tumultuous one?
- What scandals will unfold involving his life and administration, such as the federal funding of organizations like ACORN that have engaged in massive voter fraud or other criminal activities? Ultimately, will Obama be ensnared in a web, politically and legally—a victim of the very need for change that he has preached for so many years? He writes: “Real change [is] . . . an extension of my personal will and my mother’s faith. . . .”[44]
- Former Senator Edward W. Brooke, the first black U.S. Senator since Reconstruction, was a trailblazer too; however, he did not try to change America because of any deep-seated hatred of whites or our capitalist system. After reading “Dreams from My Father,” most Americans will have few if any doubts why Obama associated with and befriended Weather Underground co-founder Bill Ayers and Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. Their radical views seem consistent with his.
- The messianic adoration of Obama is reminiscent of John F. Kennedy, his presidency and sycophants. What will we learn about Barack Obama in the future? If he has feet of clay too[45], how will that factor alone manifest itself and affect America and its role in the world, and the fates and fortunes of individual Americans? Also, will our adversaries (e.g., North Korea, Al Qaeda, Iran, Russia, China) determine he is weak and naïve, and hurt our great nation deeply, capitalizing on that naïveté?
Because Obama does not appear to be religious, one wonders whether he has the courage, depth and capacity to provide the moral authority and spiritual vision and leadership to guide America and its culturally rich and diverse people through truly perilous times? Jimmy Carter was a man of God, yet he failed. Carter did not have feet of clay though. If Obama’s goal is to grow government, his naïveté knows no bounds. Having worked in and with the federal government for 21 years nonstop, I believe the only agency of government that is remotely efficient and effective is the Pentagon and our military, which have been performing magnificently.
In writing about a young black organizer named Rafiq aka Wally Thompson, Obama says: “[H]e was less interested in changing the rules of power than in the color of those who had it and who therefore enjoyed its spoils.”[46] Is that what Obama is all about too? Before he left Chicago for Kenya, he observed: “[N]otions of purity—of race or of culture—could no more serve as the basis for the typical black American’s self-esteem than it could for mine.”[47] That seems to have been an awakening for him. Also, he came face to face with the realities of his father as a man: “It was into my father’s image, the black man, son of Africa, that I’d packed all the attributes I sought in myself. . . . Now, . . . that image had suddenly vanished. Replaced by . . . what? A bitter drunk? An abusive husband? A defeated, lonely bureaucrat? To think that all my life I had been wrestling with nothing more than a ghost! . . . Whatever I do, it seems, I won’t do much worse than he did.”[48]
En route to Kenya, he referred to himself as “a Westerner not entirely at home in the West, an African on his way to a land full of strangers.”[49] He grew up in Hawaii, Indonesia and then Hawaii again, which are hardly the “heartland” of America, so his experiences were different than those of most Americans. It is arguable that he had not assimilated fully into the American “culture,” and that his father’s absence from his life—as well as his mother’s absences—contributed to his sense of abandonment and anger. In trying to find his “identity,” he had immersed himself in the writings of people who were “alienated” as well, and he embraced those lessons. He adds: “Stripped of . . . the racial obsessions to which I’d become so accustomed and which I had taken (perversely) as a sign of my own maturation[,] I had been forced to look inside myself and had found only a great emptiness there. . . . What if . . . [my father’s] leaving me behind meant nothing, and the only tie that bound me to him, or to Africa, was a name, a blood type, or white people’s scorn?”[50]
In Kenya, his alienation is reflected once again when he characterizes other tourists as expressing “a confidence reserved for those born into imperial cultures.”[51] Also, throughout the book, he expresses his intense dislike for “colonialism,” which is perhaps summarized by his thoughts as he rides a train and imagines how a British officer might have felt on its maiden voyage: “Would he have felt a sense of triumph, a confidence that the guiding light of Western civilization had finally penetrated the African darkness? Or did he feel a sense of foreboding, a sudden realization that the entire enterprise was an act of folly, that this land and its people would outlast imperial dreams?”[52] Yet, he tells his Kenyan aunts: “We’re all part of one tribe. The black tribe. The human tribe.”[53]
In terms of his presidency, his comments about the late black Chicago Mayor Harold Washington’s last campaign are interesting and instructive: “The business community sent him their checks, resigned to his presence. So secure was his power that rumblings of discontent had finally surfaced within his own base, among black nationalists upset with his willingness to cut whites and Hispanics into the action, among activists disappointed with his failure to tackle poverty head-on, and among people who preferred the dream to the reality, impotence to compromise.”[54] Will Obama’s presidency and legacy follow a similar pattern: doing enough to mollify his base, while reaching out to others in an effort to broaden that base and seek his reelection and the election of a Democrat majority in Congress during the years ahead?
Early in the book, he is careful to point out: “I wouldn’t do anything stupid. It was usually an effective tactic, another one of those tricks I had learned: People were satisfied so long as you were courteous and smiled and made no sudden moves.”[55] Perhaps those words encapsulate his political life, his campaign for the presidency, and how he is governing and hopes to survive the global economic meltdown, national security challenges and growing constituent anger, while trying to change the essence of America.
In the final analysis, will he be viewed as a fad and a feckless naïf, and a tragic Shakespearean figure who is forgotten and consigned to the dustheap of history? Will his naïveté have been matched by his overarching narcissism, and will he be considered more starry-eyed and “dangerous” than Jimmy Carter? Will his presidency be considered a sad watershed in history? Or will he succeed and prove his detractors wrong, and be viewed as the “anointed one” and a true political “messiah”? Even Abraham Lincoln was never accorded such accolades, much less during his lifetime. And Barack Obama’s core beliefs are light years away from those of Ronald Reagan.
© 2009, Timothy D. Naegele
[1] Mr. Naegele was counsel to the U.S. Senate Banking Committee; and chief of staff to Presidential Medal of Freedom recipient and former U.S. Senator Edward W. Brooke (R-Mass), the first black senator since Reconstruction after the U.S. Civil War. He practices law in Washington, D.C. and Los Angeles with his firm, Timothy D. Naegele & Associates (www.naegele.com). He has an undergraduate degree in economics from UCLA, as well as two law degrees from the School of Law (Boalt Hall), University of California, Berkeley, and from Georgetown University. He is a member of the District of Columbia and California bars. He served as a Captain in the U.S. Army, assigned to the Defense Intelligence Agency at the Pentagon, where he received the Joint Service Commendation Medal. Mr. Naegele is an Independent politically; and he is listed in Who’s Who in America, Who’s Who in American Law, and Who’s Who in Finance and Business. He has written extensively over the years. See, e.g., www.naegele.com/whats_new.html#articles
[2] Obama, “Dreams from My Father” (paperback “Revised Edition,” published by Three Rivers Press, 2004), pp. xi-xii.
[3] Id. at xii.
[4] Id. at 100.
[5] Id. at 89.
[6] Id. at 343.
[7] Id. at 193.
[8] Id. at 59-60.
[9] Id. at 80.
[10] Id. at 341.
[11] Id. at 430.
[12] Id. at 76.
[13] Id. at 79.
[14] Id. at 80.
[15] Id. at 82.
[16] Id. at 85.
[17] Id. at 125, 342.
[18] Id. at 68.
[19] Id. at 115, 270.
[20] Id. at 342-343.
[21] Id. at 129, 220.
[22] Id. at 220, 336-337.
[23] Id. at 127.
[24] Id. at 98.
[25] Id. at 98.
[26] Id. at 99 (emphasis in original).
[27] Id. at 101.
[28] Id. at 111.
[29] Id. at 118.
[30] Id. at 115; see also p. 199.
[31] Id. at 118.
[32] Id. at 124.
[33] Id. at 195.
[34] Id. at 135.
[35] Id. at 200.
[36] Id. at 201.
[37] Id. at 286-287; see also p. 295.
[38] Id. at 358.
[39] Id. at 93; see also pp. 120, 270.
[40] Id. at 133.
[41] Id. at 135.
[42] For example, Adolf Hitler tried to run his country’s military and other activities; and ultimately, he destroyed everything within his control—including Germany, at least a generation of Germans, and millions of innocent people.
[43] Id. at 182.
[44] Id. at 229.
[45] See, e.g., Thomas C. Reeves’ “A Question of Character: A Life of John F. Kennedy,” and Seymour M. Hersh’s “The Dark Side of Camelot.”
[46] Id. at 202.
[47] Id. at 204.
[48] Id. at 220-221.
[49] Id. at 301.
[50] Id. at 301-302.
[51] Id. at 312.
[52] Id. at 368.
[53] Id. at 348.
[54] Id. at 287.
[55] Id. at 94.


See http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2009-12-27-carters-love_N.htm
Regardless of one’s views of Jimmy Carter’s politics, his life with Rosalynn is a wonderful and loving story.
PLEASE NOTE:
It should be clear after reading this article that I am not interested in racists calling Barack Obama a racist. Also, in asking the question, I have left it up to the reader of this article, and of “Dreams from My Father,” to make a determination for himself and herself. All I have done is set out statements that Obama made, which seem to form a pattern, and which have never been denounced by him. I do not presume to get into his head or heart. I have included comments, especially about his mother and grandparents, which are very kind and endearing.
One’s belief in and path to God is very personal. Some people wear it on their sleeves, and shout it from the mountaintops, while others prove their faith “quietly” each and every day—by confronting challenges that are big and small, some of which may truly seem like mountains at the time.
It is in this context that one must view Barack Obama’s religious beliefs, to the extent they exist. It has been reported that he and his family publicly attended religious services in Washington, D.C. just three times in the past year, and not on Christmas Day, 2009. See http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=9689272
This seems consistent with my article above, in which I conclude after reading his book: “[H]e never expounds on any religious beliefs or spirituality, much less a belief in God.” Also, I wrote:
Time will tell.
Obama kept looking for direction as the drama in his life had more questions than answers. We can’t understand his quandry but he had a family, a home and people that loved and cared about him. He wanted his fathers attention and guidance but was ignored. We get that. Give me a break….so many children have had poor care and have moved on. Obama is his own man. Poor me is pathetic. He’s very clever and it’s totally obvious he wants us to be a european democracy. He surrounds himself with radicals and definately shares their views. He sold us on being a centrist and turned out to be a leftist and a poor leader. The no drama Obama is proving nugatory. He loves the camera and is finally getting the attention he lacked as a child.
Thank you for your comments, Lee.
Yes, I agree. “Dreams from My Father” is a fascinating book, which I read twice after the election.
As indicated in the article above, he took that direction when he was a student at Punahou in Honolulu, long before he set foot on the American mainland—and after having lived in Indonesia too, with his mother’s Indonesian husband.
Based on the book and everything else that I have read, she and young Barry’s father never married, much less got a divorce. It is clear though that his father had multiple “wives,” as well as children with his first wife in Kenya before he ever set foot in Hawaii.
His father was with young Barry for only one month of his life, when he was 10 and the father visited Honolulu. Barry’s mother was often gone, so the only stabilizing influences in his life were his maternal grandparents, “Toot” and “Gramps.” They loved him dearly and nourished him, and he acknowledges that. In fact, the most touching comments in the book are about his mother and her parents. They were his rock—which is why the anti-White sentiments in his book and his later life are “stunning,” to say the least.
Also, I agree with your comments: “He sold us on being a centrist and turned out to be a leftist and a poor leader.” As I point out in the article above: he has never been “successful at anything other than writing, speaking, campaigning, politics and getting elected—being a professional politician.” He and his Chicago crowd (e.g., Rahm Emanuel) may be in the process of getting their political comuppance, bigtime.
Lastly, there is no question that he is a narcissist; and as European leaders point out, he is too arrogant to admit when he knows little or nothing about a subject. This may be a basis of his undoing ultimately, among other factors.
Mr. Naegele,
Why are you not involved in politics? We as a country need smart leaders as yourself.
We can only hope Americans won’t have short memories come 2012. They so much want to believe in this young knight. He may try to change his stripes but the wind is at his back. Everyday his suporters are deminishing. Too much time is still left, but we’ll see. He’s so comfortable in his skin but is bound to suffer foot’n mouth disease which will impair his performance.
I may be over the hill, (a senior) but it’s better than being under it.
Again, get involved. Thanks for your input.
How nice of you to say this, Lee, but I have been there and done that. See, e.g., http://www.naegele.com/naegele_resume.html
I may help with a campaign shortly, but I am only interested where there is a chance to make a real difference.
In the world of politics, 2012 is light years away. So many things can happen between now and then that it is difficult if not impossible to predict. What is most important, or so I believe, is that Independents who supported Obama are deserting him. They can and will tip the scales.
However, the GOP must have a candidate who can beat him, unless he becomes so damaged—like Jimmy Carter was—that the door is open to lots of GOP candidates, which may happen.
Before reading his book, I had two reasons not to vote for him: national security and the economy. I believe he has been a disaster with respect to both; and it is only apt to get much worse before he leaves office.
See, e.g, http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/26/obama-in-afghanistan-doomed-from-the-start and http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/01/20/the-end-of-barack-obama/
Your comments are excellent, and you may want to get involved too!
Obama’s Policy Of Slapping Allies
This is the title of an article by the Washington Post’s Charles Krauthammer, which is worth reading—as are all of his weekly columns.
See http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/01/AR2010040102805.html
The fact is that most if not all of Barack Obama’s views and policies are understandable if one reads his “Dreams from My Father.”
His treatment of Prime Minister Gordon Brown and the Brits mirrors his feelings about “colonialism,” and “imperial” cultures and dreams. For example, as my article states, in Kenya his alienation was reflected when he characterized other tourists as expressing “a confidence reserved for those born into imperial cultures.”
See Barack Obama, “Dreams from My Father” (paperback “Revised Edition,” published by Three Rivers Press, 2004), p. 312.
Also, his intense dislike for colonialism is perhaps summarized by his thoughts when he rode on a train and imagined how a British officer might have felt on its maiden voyage:
See id. at 368; see also http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/is-barack-obama-a-racist
Krauthammer’s quoting of David Manning—a former British ambassador to the United States—is apt: “[Obama] is an American who grew up in Hawaii, whose foreign experience was of Indonesia and who had a Kenyan father. The sentimental reflexes, if you like, are not there.” Even more precisely, Obama was repulsed by colonialism and the British Empire, and it is reflected in his policies today.
With respect to the Falkland Islands and India, his policies may simply reflect his views about colonialism.
Aside from the fact that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is the most dangerous and irresponsible leader that Israel has ever had, Obama’s dislike for him probably reflects his belief that the Israelis are the oppressors, and the Palestinians are the oppressed, much like he viewed Apartheid in South Africa.
See, e.g., http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/02/20/israels-senseless-killings-and-war-with-iran/
Why Obama coddles the Russians is unfathomable though, unless he seeks their help with Iran, which is very naive.
See also http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/02/09/russias-putin-is-a-killer/
His treatment of Honduras is a mystery too, unless some policy advisers have convinced him.
“Aside from the fact that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is the most dangerous and irresponsible leader that Israel has ever had.”
Based on your other comments re Israel over the years, methinks that any Israeli not willing to surrender their (God-given—there I said it!) land to blood-thirsty terrorists who can’t even live in peace with their own kind, is dangerous and irresponsible in your eyes.
Thank you for your comments, Joseph, which mirror what you said in a postings below.
Again, I have discussed these issues fully in another article, and in postings beneath it, which I will not repeat here. You might wish to read them.
See http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/02/20/israels-senseless-killings-and-war-with-iran/
Mr. Naegele,
Thank you for a very interesting, thorough, and thoughtful analysis of the narrative about Obama in Dreams From My Father.
I say “about Obama” because I do not believe Obama wrote the book. He does not and never did possess the literary talent or skills to create anything remotely resembling it.
Jack Cashill has done a meticulous job deconstructing both the text and the style of the book, and concludes, I believe irrefutably, that the book was authored in whole or substantial part by Obama’s friend and neighbor, veteran writer William Ayers.
http://www.cashill.com/intellect_fraud/improvised_odyssey.htm
Cashill’s thesis has been confirmed in the recent Obama bio by Christopher Andersen, Barack and Michelle: Portrait of an American Marriage. Andersen reports that Obama, who was under contract and unable to produce a manuscript, at Michelle’s urging “sought advice from his friend and Hyde Park neighbor Bill Ayers.” What attracted the Obamas were “Ayers’s proven abilities as a writer.” Obama delivered a box of his notes and tape recorded memos, and then, “Thanks to help from the veteran writer Ayers,” writes Andersen, “Barack would be able to submit a manuscript to his editors at Times Books.”
The book, like Obama, is a fraud. And when it is read with the understanding that the real voice is that of a radical revolutionary and member of the Weather Underground – the words takes on substantially different and considerably more ominous meanings.
Thank you, Winston, for your comments.
Yes, I am aware of what you describe (e.g., that Ayers wrote at least part of the book), and it may be true.
The book is very well written, yet shocking in many respects, as my article above points out. If more Americans had read the book, I doubt he would have been elected.
His policies to date are consistent with the book, as I have pointed out in this and other articles.
See, e.g., http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/26/obama-in-afghanistan-doomed-from-the-start and http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/01/01/barack-obama-america’s-second-emperor and http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/01/20/the-end-of-barack-obama
What Would Reagan Do?
The Wall Street Journal has a fine article by David Malpass entitled, “The Panic, Round Two: What Would Reagan Do?” that is worth reading.
See http://www.naegele.com/documents/DavidMalpass-ThePanicRoundTwo-WhatWouldReaganDo.pdf
Yes, the panics are upon us—and there will be many of them globally—as America and the world sink deeper into what economic historians will describe 20-40 years from now as the “Great Depression II,” or by some similar label.
See, e.g., http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/16/the-great-depression-ii
David Malpass is right in asking what would Reagan do, because the former president—certainly at the top of his game—might have figured out a way of getting us out of this mess, or of somehow making it less onerous than it will be. After all, he was a creature of the “Great Depression I,” and he learned its lessons well.
Unemployment peaked at 10.8 percent in December 1982, two years after his election—which was higher than any time since the first Great Depression—then dropped during the rest of Reagan’s presidency. But facts and figures do not tell the whole story of the Reagan presidency by any means: his personality and leadership qualities, and his ability to instill hope and optimism.
See, e.g., http://www.usnews.com/money/business-economy/articles/2009/08/27/is-unemployment-the-worst-since-the-great-depression.html
One must remember too that Paul Volcker was Chairman of the Fed, and he contributed mightily to keeping the economy on an even keel, and preventing runaway inflation. He was followed by Alan Greenspan, who never saw the Housing Crisis coming, and he testified to that before a House committee. Or, as Giulio Tremonti, Italy’s Minister of Economy and Finance, put it: “Greenspan was considered a master. Now we must ask ourselves whether he is not, after [Osama] bin Laden, the man who hurt America the most.” That speaks volumes, in terms of the human suffering domestically and globally, which Greenspan launched.
See http://www.americanbanker.com/issues/173_212/-365185-1.html; see also http://www.philstockworld.com/2009/10/11/greenspan’s-legacy-more-suffering-to-come/
Implicit in Malpass’ fine article is the fact that Congress does not know what it is doing. Most politicians have zero training in economics, and do not understand it, and have no appreciation for economic history. They are simply interested in getting elected and reelected, and wielding power while they have it.
Malpass adds correctly:
However, Ronald Reagan’s leadership was broader and more important than that. He instilled confidence and optimism when there had been little or none, across the board (e.g., national security, economics).
See also http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/03/20/ronald-reagan-and-john-f-kennedy-a-question-of-character/
Sadly, Reagan’s leadership and vision are lacking now, as wrong-headed politicians lead us father down the path toward financial ruin, dashing the hopes and dreams of Americans and their counterparts worldwide. However, the days of reckoning are upon us. America and other nations are in uncharted waters; and their politicians may face backlashes from disillusioned and angry constituents that are unprecedented in modern times. We are beginning to see that now.
Also, Barack Obama has zero experience with respect to economic and a plethora of other issues. Americans should read (or reread) his “Dreams from My Father,” and realize that he is one of the most “uneducated” presidents in American history, in terms of real-world issues. This is not said by way of condemnation, but as a fact.
See, e.g., http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/is-barack-obama-a-racist/
At best he is an academic. Perhaps more importantly, he and his advisers are “a bunch of academics” and ideologues, who have pre-set ideas about how the world should function, which do not square with reality. In many ways, they are the most ill-equipped individuals to confront and understand the “Great Depression II,” much get us through it.
I cannot think of another group that is so ill-equipped to deal with critical issues facing America and the world (e.g., two wars, the risk of any EMP or other devastating attack, North Korea, China, Russia, Iran, the Great Depression II). Fortunately, no calamities hit the Clinton years. We are not and will not be so lucky this time around.
Lastly, Ronald Reagan was blessed—yes, blessed by God. He had innate wisdom and a reservoir of faith, confidence, optimism and good will, and collective life experiences that allowed him to do just the right thing at the right time. Clearly, the fall of the “Evil Empire” was a shining achievement, but there were many many others too.
Obama Loathes the British, Colonialism And The Israelis
My article above explains Barack Obama’s feelings about the British and Colonialism, which are clear when one reads his book, “Dreams from My Father.” He hated apartheid too, which he equates with the Israelis’ treatment of the Palestinians.
UK’s Daily Mail has an interesting article, which states in part:
See http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1287828/Revealed-Why-President-Obama-loathes-British.html
This article is consistent with Obama’s “Dreams from My Father.”
While I share many of your opinions, I find your hatred of Israel, a fellow democracy trying to survive in a sea of hate, both perplexing and disturbing. Casting your lot with murderous savages over peace-loving Israel reveals the blackness of your soul.
Ironically, it was when Jew-haters like yourself mobbed the Dreyfuss trial in Paris a century or so ago that Hertzl envisoned a Jewish State as a refuge. The good Lord has a wonderful sense of irony don’t you think?
Thank you, Joseph, for your comments.
I do not hate Israel at all. My views on this subject are set forth in another article that you may wish to read (and the postings beneath it), about the damage being done by Netanyahu.
See http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/02/20/israels-senseless-killings-and-war-with-iran/
As stated in that article, Netanyahu was hated by former Israeli Prime Ministers Ariel Sharon and Yitzhak Rabin—and especially by Rabin’s wife Leah, who blamed Netanyahu for her husband’s assassination. She saw “only doom for the Israeli-Palestinian peace process” with Netanyahu at Israel’s helm; and of course she was correct.
Also, I am forever reminded of what a prominent American (who is a Jew and a strong supporter of Israel with impeccable credentials) told me a number of years ago:
I was stunned by this person’s words, and I have reflected on them many times since. This undergirds my sense of urgency concerning the Israeli-Palestinian peace process—not peace at any price, but something different than the approach being taken by Netanyahu.
Hi Tim,
Very nice article. BHO’s life story is representative of most of the problematic issues our country faces with regard to its citizenry politically, psychologically, and culturally. It also demonstrates the hope that America provides to its people.
BHO is a lightningrod for the disaffected. It is clear that with his childhood, he grew up feeling disillusioned and more than a little angry at his life situation. The fact that his father abandoned the family was clearly the most seminal fact that shaped his core belief system, which you point out, probably does not include a strong belief in God.
But his rise to power is also indicative of what a determined and intelligent person can do in this country.
I think the lesson we learn from this presidency is that America is great enough to allow the common man rise to the highest level, but that high level does not come cheaply or without responsibility.
America is smarter now after experiencing a president like BHO. He should be commended and respected for his accomplishments. But we, and he, should learn from his mistakes. We all need to change course a bit in reaction to what we have learned from BHO to make America even greater than it already is.
Thank you, Keith, for your thoughtful comments.
Yes, I agree completely. Well said.
“As stated in that article, Netanyahu was hated by former Israeli Prime Ministers Ariel Sharon and Yitzhak Rabin—and especially by Rabin’s wife Leah, who blamed Netanyahu for her husband’s assassination. She saw ‘only doom for the Israeli-Palestinian peace process’ with Netanyahu at Israel’s helm; and of course she was correct.”
I recall the Oslo days clearly and distinctly remember Leah Rabin partying on, and her husband and Shimon Peres hobnobbing with European elites as daily bus bombings in Jerusalem murdered hundreds while the three of them and their stooges blithely droned on regarding the need to “sacrifice” for peace and how one does not make peace with friends but with sworn enemies.
And you knew of an Israeli who was critical of his own government, eh? Well I know some Moslems and Arabs who support Israel, so I guess that makes us even.
After two years of Obama it is quite evident he pretends to talk the talk but hides his descrimination. He’s definitely a racist along with his whole administration. As I said before he’s going to be a one term president. We may not know the whole man but his views are so flawed and should be impeached. His friend George Schwartz Soros speaks his language, supports his agenda and dictates all of his policies. No need to say more.
. . .
Will Barack Obama Go Down In History As The President Who Lost The Middle East?
As I have written:
See http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/12/03/barack-obama-is-a-lame-duck-president-who-will-not-be-reelected
He is a cowardly demagogue, who failed to come to the aid of those courageous Iranians who were tortured and killed after rising up in protest against the disputed victory of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, following the 2009 Iranian presidential election.
It was a seminal moment in Obama’s presidency up to that point in time. He flinched, and demonstrated to the world that he is not a true small-”d” democrat; and that he is weak like Jimmy Carter was. He stood with our enemy, the theocracy in Iran.
With respect to Egypt, the United States must do whatever is necessary to make sure that radical Islam does not take over the country. If it happens, and if that spreads—for example to Jordan, another ally of ours and of Israel—at the very least Obama will go down in history as the president who lost the Middle East. Also, this might determine the fate of Israel.
See http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/09/27/the-economic-tsunami-continues-its-relentless-and-unforgiving-advance-globally/#comment-1344; but see http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703833204576114252976824050.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop (“Egypt . . . has the opportunity to become what it always should have been—the leader of a movement toward freedom and democracy in the Arab world”)
Political pundit and former Bill Clinton adviser, Dick Morris, has warned:
See http://www.dickmorris.com/blog/who-lost-egypt/
The United States cannot afford to lose Egypt, Jordan and other allies in the region. Among other things, Obama is pulling our forces out of Iraq; and a debacle is likely to follow in Afghanistan too, which seems to be a lost cause. All of this might determine the fate of Israel.
See, e.g., http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110201/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_iraq;_ylt=Akg0dRp1i4NSyUsUi6YKt.0LewgF;_ylu=X3oDMTJkdnRuaHE2BGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTEwMjAxL21sX2lyYXEEcG9zAzEEc2VjA3luX3BhZ2luYXRlX3N1bW1hcnlfbGlzdARzbGsDc2VuYXRlcmVwb3J0 (“American diplomats and other mission employees may not be safe in Iraq if the U.S. military leaves the volatile country at the end of the year as planned, according to a new report released [by the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee]“)
As I have written:
See http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/12/03/barack-obama-is-a-lame-duck-president-who-will-not-be-reelected (emphasis added)
Obama might tragically alter America’s history by losing the Middle East.
The Israelis are deeply and justifiably concerned. In an important article entitled, “Israel shocked by Obama’s ‘betrayal’ of Mubarak,” Reuters has reported:
See http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/01/31/us-egypt-israel-usa-idUSTRE70U53720110131; see also http://apnews.myway.com/article/20110130/D9L2Q1Q00.html (“If Egypt resumes its conflict with Israel, Israelis fear, it will put a powerful Western-armed military on the side of Israel’s enemies while also weakening pro-Western states like Jordan and Saudi Arabia”)
Also, in an article captioned, “Israel Watches ‘Regional Earthquake’ in Egypt,” the Wall Street Journal has reported:
See http://www.naegele.com/documents/IsraelWatchesRegionalEarthquakeinEgypt.pdf
The battle of Cairo has begun, just as battles have begun elsewhere in the Middle East. They will be ugly and brutal. When the dust settles finally, America’s “Hamlet on the Potomac”—or “Jimmy Carter-lite”—Barack Obama might have lost the region, just as Carter lost Iran to Islamic fascists. The consequences will be mind-boggling.
See also http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703445904576117801815760950.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories#articleTabs%3Dinteractive (The Wall Street Journal’s Interactive Timeline of “Regional Upheaval” in the Middle East)
Your description of the situation at hand is correct. We are at a crossroads that could put us in harm’s way. Unfortunately, our president has surrounded himself with a bunch of idiots—as in “birds of a feather, flock together.”
In depth and impressive. Frighteningly so…..
Obama Is A Fool And A Political Naïf, And The Israelis Recognize It
In an important article entitled, “US response to Egypt draws criticism in Israel,” the AP has reported:
See http://apnews.myway.com/article/20110203/D9L59U1G0.html (emphasis added); see also http://www.economist.com/node/18065691 (“Worried Israel: Bad news for the Jewish state: Egypt’s upheaval is rattling the Israelis“)
As emphasized above, one conclusion jumps out:
Beyond that, he may be remembered as the American president who lost the Middle East, or certainly large portions of it. Again, he is an utter fool and a feckless naïf, and he must be removed from office before he can do even more damage to America and U.S. interests.
Is Barack Obama America’s Most Polarizing President Ever?
The UK’s Daily Mail has an article that expresses astonishment at the fact that Barack Obama divides the U.S. more than any second-year president in more than half a century. The article states in pertinent part:
See http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1353753/Obama-divides-U-S-second-year-president-half-century.html and http://www.gallup.com/poll/145937/Obama-Approval-Ratings-Polarized-Year-Year.aspx (Gallup poll results); see also http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/12/03/barack-obama-is-a-lame-duck-president-who-will-not-be-reelected/#comment-1180 (“George W. Bush’s Memoir Sells 2 Million Copies In A Month, Nearly As Many As Bill Clinton’s Sold In Six Years”) and http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/12/03/barack-obama-is-a-lame-duck-president-who-will-not-be-reelected/#comment-1075 (“Bush Job Approval Rating Higher Than Obama’s”)
Neither the writer of the article nor the Daily Mail should be “astonished” in the least about what has happened to Barack Obama. In fact, such astonishment reflects enormous naïveté about U.S. politics and the American people.
The high-water mark of the Obama presidency was reached when Congress passed his signature health care legislation, “ObamaCare.” A U.S. federal court has just struck down that law in its entirety; and Congress is moving to repeal it as well.
See, e.g., http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/12/03/barack-obama-is-a-lame-duck-president-who-will-not-be-reelected/#comment-1360 (“ObamaCare May Be History, And Barack Obama May Be Too”)
Obama is a fool and a feckless naïf, and a tragic Shakespearean figure who will be forgotten and consigned to the dustheap of history—unless he tragically alters the course of American history.
If he loses Egypt and other countries of the Middle East to Islamic fascism, and the American economy continues to decline, and he loses the Afghan War, he will have changed history, for the worse.
See, e.g., http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/is-barack-obama-a-racist/#comment-1357 (“Will Barack Obama Go Down In History As The President Who Lost The Middle East?”) and http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/12/03/barack-obama-is-a-lame-duck-president-who-will-not-be-reelected/#comment-1368 (“Obama Is A Fool And A Political Naïf, And The Israelis Recognize It”) and http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/12/03/barack-obama-is-a-lame-duck-president-who-will-not-be-reelected/#comment-1336 (“SHOCK CLAIM: Hawaii Governor Admits There Are No Obama Birth Records In Hawaii”)
Lastly, racism is not what has turned off so many Americans. On the contrary, Obama is a far-left president in a center-right country; and he was “packaged” before the 2008 elections as a moderate, which was fraud. Those who voted for him are increasingly having “buyer’s remorse,” and this is especially true of Independents—who comprise approximately 35 percent of American voters—and members of the Tea Party movement, and “disenchanted” Democrats. These three groups, plus Republicans, may seal Obama’s political fate as the 2012 elections approach.
See, e.g., http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/03/31/the-rise-of-independents/
OBAMA MUST BE IMPEACHED!
“WikiLeaks cables: US agrees to tell Russia Britain’s nuclear secrets”
This is the title of the UK Telegraph’s article—subtitled, “The US secretly agreed to give the Russians sensitive information on Britain’s nuclear deterrent to persuade them to sign a key treaty, The Daily Telegraph can disclose”—which states:
See http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8304654/WikiLeaks-cables-US-agrees-to-tell-Russia-Britains-nuclear-secrets.html#
Obama must be impeached, now!
He needs to be dumped before the next election. The Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives must begin investigations immediately, laying the basis for the impeachment process.
Russia’s dictator-for-life Putin is our enemy, and cutting any deals with him is equivalent to cutting deals with Adolf Hitler before or during World War II.
See, e.g., http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/02/09/russias-putin-is-a-killer/
Obama is a traitor. We have always known that!
See, e.g., http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/is-barack-obama-a-racist/#comment-1357 (“Will Barack Obama Go Down In History As The President Who Lost The Middle East?”) and http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/12/03/barack-obama-is-a-lame-duck-president-who-will-not-be-reelected/#comment-1247 (“Obama Trashes Pentagon, And Must Be Impeached!”)
Also, his hatred for the British seems to know no bounds. In his book, “Dreams from My Father,” he set forth his core beliefs, which I have discussed at length in an article. For example:
See http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/is-barack-obama-a-racist/
Is Barack Obama Becoming A Handmaiden To Islamic Fascists?
It is a given that Obama is a cowardly demagogue. For example, he failed to come to the aid of those courageous Iranians who were tortured and killed after rising up in protest against the disputed victory of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, following the 2009 Iranian presidential election. The government of Iran is America’s enemy. Egypt’s Mubarak has been our ally, whom Obama has been “throwing under the bus”—which the Israelis understand fully, and watch with dismay and revulsion.
See, e.g., http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/is-barack-obama-a-racist/#comment-1367 (“Obama Is A Fool And A Political Naïf, And The Israelis Recognize It”)
The Brits—another staunch ally—are outraged that Obama has agreed to tell Russia Britain’s nuclear secrets. The UK’s Telegraph has reported that Obama secretly agreed to give the Russians sensitive information about Britain’s nuclear deterrent to persuade them to sign the New START Treaty, which is traitorous and an impeachable offense.
See, e.g., http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/12/03/barack-obama-is-a-lame-duck-president-who-will-not-be-reelected/#comment-1383
The battle of Cairo has begun, just as battles have begun elsewhere in the Middle East. They will be ugly and brutal. When the dust settles finally, America’s far-Left, naïve, anti-war, narcissistic president—our “Hamlet on the Potomac” or “Jimmy Carter-lite”—Barack Obama might have lost not just Egypt but the entire region, just as Carter lost Iran to Islamic fascists. The consequences will be mind-boggling.
See http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/is-barack-obama-a-racist/#comment-1357; see also http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.4f6d274f3aeb88a025c7211f3b0a1ee7.3b1&show_article=1 (“Jordan will sooner or later be the target of an uprising similar to the ones in Tunisia and Egypt”)
Obama is a fool and a feckless naïf, who is pulling out of Iraq completely. His policies are leading to the utter failure of his Afghan War; and it is simply a matter of time before he cuts and runs from there as well. As shrewd as Hillary and Bill Clinton can be at times, they seem to miss the fact that we may be in the midst of “The Clash of Civilizations” that Samuel P. Huntington wrote about—which Richard Nixon worried about.
See, e.g., http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Clash_of_Civilizations; but see http://www.economist.com/node/18063852 (“[George W.] Bush was . . . a far more active champion of democracy than Mr Obama has been. . . . [T]he experts who scoffed at Mr Bush for thinking that Arabs wanted and were ready for democracy on the Western model are suddenly looking less clever—and Mr Bush’s simple and rather wonderful notion that Arabs want, deserve and are capable of democracy is looking rather wise”)
Islamic fascists find democratic movements and democracies abhorrent to them; and they are outwitting Obama at every turn, and making him into their handmaiden.
In an important Wall Street Journal article entitled, “Could al Qaeda Hijack Egypt’s Revolution?”—and subtitled, “Terrorists in Pakistan and mullahs in Tehran want to see chaos in Cairo. A splintered army and premature elections would help their cause”—Kenneth M. Pollack writes:
See http://www.naegele.com/documents/KennethM.Pollack-CouldalQaedaHijackEgyptsRevolution.pdf; see also http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703313304576132362771119834.html?mod=WSJ_hp_MIDDLENexttoWhatsNewsSecond (“In the Desert, a Tourist Drought”)
The Collapse Of The Mubarak Regime, Wholly Unexpected A Month Ago, May Constitute A Precursor Of What Is To Come Elsewhere In The Middle East
Which countries are next? Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Iraq, Israel? Where this stops, no one knows.
For those who think that it might never happen in Israel, the following comments—from an article in the UK’s Economist—are sobering:
See http://www.economist.com/node/18065691 (“Worried Israel: Bad news for the Jewish state: Egypt’s upheaval is rattling the Israelis“); see also http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/is-barack-obama-a-racist/#comment-1367 (“Obama Is A Fool And A Political Naïf, And The Israelis Recognize It”) and http://af.reuters.com/article/tunisiaNews/idAFLDE71C0KP20110213?sp=true (“Gaddafi tells Palestinians: revolt against Israel”)
Will the Jewish state be the next to fall—or among the next?
Another crucial question to ask is whether Barack Obama is the handmaiden of Islamic fascists, and whether he is facilitating the fall of America’s allies in the Middle East like dominoes?
See, e.g., http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/is-barack-obama-a-racist/#comment-1385
With respect to Israel, it bears repeating that I am forever reminded of what a prominent American (who is a Jew and a strong supporter of Israel) told me a number of years ago:
I was stunned by this person’s words, and I have reflected on them many times since. I have always assumed that Israel would be attacked from outside of “Palestine,” but not from within.
. . .
An editorial in the Wall Street Journal states:
However, one must never forget that America’s far-Left, naïve, anti-war, narcissistic president—“Hamlet on the Potomac” or “Jimmy Carter-lite”—Barack Obama failed to come to the aid of those courageous Iranians who were tortured and killed after rising up in protest against the disputed victory of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, following the 2009 Iranian presidential election.
Even worse, he coddled and gave comfort to America’s enemies, the brutal theocratic regime in that country. The Journal was guarded and too kind when it described his conduct as an “embarrassing silence.” It was nothing short of cruel; and he may have “signed” the death sentences of courageous Iranian protesters—but this is true of other uncaring, raving narcissists like Obama.
See, e.g., http://www.naegele.com/documents/IranianCrackdownGoesGlobal.pdf (“Iranian Crackdown Goes Global”) and http://www.naegele.com/documents/PresidentObamaSnubsIransDemocrats.pdf (“The President Snubs Iran’s Democrats”) and http://www.naegele.com/documents/Iransentences5todeathinpostelectionturmoil.pdf (“Iran sentences 5 to death in postelection turmoil”) and http://www.naegele.com/documents/IranianProtestersSentencedtoDeath.pdf (“An Alternative Nobel”)
For example, one Journal article—dated November 3, 2009—stated:
See http://www.naegele.com/documents/PresidentObamaSnubsIransDemocrats.pdf
Also, the four articles cited immediately above stated: (1) the regime cracked down hard at home, and a Wall Street Journal investigation showed that it extended that crackdown to many of the 4 million Iranians living abroad as well; (2) Obama’s “engagement” with Iran was about nuclear weapons alone, no matter how many innocent Iranians were being beaten, tortured, raped and killed for expressing their hope for change; (3) the Iranian courts sentenced at least 89 defendants and 81 of them got prison terms ranging from six months up to 15 years; (4) the Obama Administration downplayed human rights in Iran as it pursued a negotiated nuclear settlement with the Ahmadinejad government; and (5) forgotten—at least by Barack Obama—is 27-year old Neda Aga Soltan, whose murder in June of 2009 by one of Ahmadinejad’s goon squads was captured on a video seen around the world.
. . .
In the final analysis, what is happening in Egypt and elsewhere may be another vindication of George W. Bush. Indeed, the Journal added:
See http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704364004576132281877448852.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_AboveLEFTTop; see also http://www.economist.com/node/18063852 (“[George W.] Bush was . . . a far more active champion of democracy than Mr Obama has been. . . . [T]he experts who scoffed at Mr Bush for thinking that Arabs wanted and were ready for democracy on the Western model are suddenly looking less clever—and Mr Bush’s simple and rather wonderful notion that Arabs want, deserve and are capable of democracy is looking rather wise”) and http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/03/03/AR2011030304239.html (“[R]evolutions are sweeping the Middle East and everyone is a convert to George W. Bush’s freedom agenda”)
OBAMA IS A FOOL!
He has compared himself with Ronald Reagan, by referring to himself as “The Gipper”—which is the moral equivalent of comparing Adolf Hitler favorably with Mother Teresa.
See http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/02/11/obama_refers_to_himself_as_the_gipper_in_farewell_to_gibbs.html
Another fool—who fancied being the president too—was Mike Dukakis who ran against George H.W. Bush in 1988, and was “destroyed” by him electorally. Hopefully the same thing happens to Obama between now and the 2012 elections.
Is The Rift Widening Between Obama And Hillary?
Hillary and Bill Clinton fought hard to defeat Barack Obama in 2008, and there was no love lost between their respective political camps.
Among others, political pundit and former adviser to Bill Clinton, Dick Morris, has suggested that when the timing is right, the Clintons will strike at Obama again—in all likelihood, before the 2012 primary elections.
See http://www.dickmorris.com/blog/obama-may-face-left-wing-primary/; see also http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/12/03/barack-obama-is-a-lame-duck-president-who-will-not-be-reelected, footnote 10.
It has been reported that Obama was “furious” with Hillary’s State Department over Egypt, and that they undercut him at every turn.
See http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/obama-clinton-egypt-policy/2011/02/13/id/385923?s and http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/13/world/middleeast/13diplomacy.html (“Obama was furious, and it did not help that his secretary of state, Hillary Rodham Clinton . . . was publicly warning that any credible transition would take time—even as Mr. Obama was demanding that change in Egypt begin right away”)
This might be a preview of what is to come as the 2012 primaries and general election approach. Obama and the Clintons may become overt political enemies again.
The Middle East Is On Fire Again, And Crazy Muslims With Funny Names Aren’t Helping Things—. . . Barack . . .
This is the first paragraph of Ann Coulter’s latest column entitled, “Democrats: Emboldening America’s Enemies & Terrifying Her Allies Since 1976,” which added:
See http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=41848; see also http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/is-barack-obama-a-racist/#comment-1408
OBAMA’S AFGHAN WAR IS OVER, AND HE HAS LOST IT TO AMERICA’S ENEMIES
In an article entitled, “US faces exodus of top Afghanistan team”—and subtitled, “The US faces the loss of four senior members of its Afghanistan team in coming months, leaving President Barack Obama with a gaping lack of experience as the conflict enters a critical phase and the public expects a withdrawal of troops to start”—the UK’s Telegraph has reported:
See http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/afghanistan/8329079/US-faces-exodus-of-top-Afghanistan-team.html
First, like Jimmy Carter before him, Obama’s first term in office will be his only term in office. He is finished as America’s “Community-Organizer-In-Chief,” and will return to either Chicago or Hawaii permanently in January of 2013—at the latest—to lick his political wounds, write his memoirs, and work on his presidential library.
Second, “victory” is a word that Obama has never used with respect to his Afghan War; and like the North Vietnamese before them, the Taliban may begin using that term in the not-too-distant future. Obama’s Afghan War is lost, and the Taliban have won it, and Afghan women will pay a horrible price in the process.
See, e.g., http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/12/03/barack-obama-is-a-lame-duck-president-who-will-not-be-reelected/#comment-1102
Third, if the speculation is true, David Petraeus will have “escaped” with his reputation intact, to become Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, which will be his reward for “rescuing” Obama from the McChrystal debacle—unless, of course, Obama blows the Petraeus appointment too.
Fourth, McChrystal is rumored to have a book coming out shortly before the 2012 elections, which may “fry” Obama politically.
Lastly, I have been told by a foreign policy “legend”:
The Goal Of A Global Caliphate . . . And Barack Obama’s Reticence To Fight It
Arnaud de Borchgrave—editor at large of The Washington Times and of United Press International—has written another excellent and very sobering article entitled, “Gullible amnesia,” which is worth reading and reflecting on. In it, he states in pertinent part:
See http://www.upi.com/Top_News/Analysis/de-Borchgrave/2011/02/22/Commentary-Gullible-amnesia/UPI-47511298374510/
Because of the Muslim influence during Obama’s formative years when he was growing up in Indonesia, one wonders whether he has the will, determination and capacity to fight against a regional—much less a global—caliphate on behalf of the American people. Or is he merely a handmaiden of Islamic fascists, and a useful “tool” for them?
See, e.g., http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/is-barack-obama-a-racist/#comment-1385
China’s Jasmine Crackdown
Obama is an utter buffoon, who will not be reelected.
Why is he silent when the forces of democracy are moving in China—like he was silent and failed to come to the aid of those courageous Iranians who were tortured and killed after rising up in protest against the disputed victory of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, following the 2009 Iranian presidential election?
See http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d4fcf4e6-3f6d-11e0-a1ba-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1EpwDexBl (“Nervous China puts security apparatus into overdrive“) and http://www.theworld.org/2011/02/22/china%E2%80%99s-jasmine-crackdown/ (“China’s Jasmine crackdown“) and http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2011/01/13/china-is-americas-enemy-make-no-mistake-about-that/ (“China Is America’s Enemy: Make No Mistake About That“) and http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/12/03/barack-obama-is-a-lame-duck-president-who-will-not-be-reelected/#comment-1406 (“The Collapse Of The Mubarak Regime, Wholly Unexpected A Month Ago, May Constitute A Precursor Of What Is To Come Elsewhere In The Middle East“) and http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/is-barack-obama-a-racist/#comment-1445 (“The Goal Of A Global Caliphate . . . And Barack Obama’s Reticence To Fight It“)
These People Are Lowlifes
In an article entitled,”Michelle Obama welcomes rapper to White House who called for burning of George Bush,” the UK’s Daily Mail has reported:
See http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1385334/Michelle-Obama-welcomes-rapper-Common-called-burning-George-Bush.html
What scum!
As one American commenter noted:
Amen in spades. The police are outraged too, and justifiably so—but this is who the Obamas are!
See, e.g., http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/NJ-State-Police-Outraged-Over-Rapper-Invited-to-White-House-121596869.html (“NJ State Police ‘Outraged’ Over Rapper Invite to White House“) and http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1386032/Outrage-Michelle-Obama-welcomes-rapper-Common-White-House.html (“Obama joins Michelle at racially charged White House reception for rapper who praised Black Panther cop killer and singer who condemned mixed race marriages“); see also http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/12/03/barack-obama-is-a-lame-duck-president-who-will-not-be-reelected (“Barack Obama Is A Lame-Duck President Who Will Not Be Reelected”)
Anyone who does not realize that down deep Barack and Michelle Obama are racists has never read his book, “Dreams from My Father,” nor understood their genuine affinity and affection for their former pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright—at least until they threw him “under the bus” politically. It is who they are; their core beliefs and essence.
Barack Obama’s ACORN Is History
The Associated Press has reported:
See http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110620/ap_on_re_us/us_supreme_court_acorn_lawsuit; see also http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/is-barack-obama-a-racist/
The next step will be to send Obama to Chicago or Hawaii no later than January of 2013, to lick his political wounds and write his memoirs, and work full time on his presidential library. For the good of the country, it cannot happen fast enough!
Is Race A Factor In My Comments About Barack Obama and Tiger Woods?
First, as I have said and written:
See http://www.philstockworld.com/2009/10/11/greenspan’s-legacy-more-suffering-to-come/ (Interview with Timothy D. Naegele: “Greenspan’s legacy: more suffering to come”) and http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/02/26/america-a-rich-tapestry-of-life/ (“America: A Rich Tapestry Of Life”); see also http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/2951-ilene/31177-interview-with-timothy-d-naegele
Second, race is still an issue in our society, and discrimination exists; and neither Woods nor Obama have changed that fact. One would be very naïve to think otherwise. However, both Woods and Obama have taken giant steps to tear down the color barriers that had existed, just as others before them had done.
Third, if anyone thinks that African-Americans who voted for Obama overwhelmingly in 2008 will not be upset—and, indeed, angry—if he is not reelected, such a person is naïve and knows essentially nothing about race relations and national politics in the United States today.
Fourth, many African-American women are very sensitive about African-American men who do not date and/or marry African-American women. This is a fact. Because Woods seems never to have dated an African-American woman, African-American women are not likely to defend him or come to his aid if the scandals swirling about him intensify even more.
See, e.g., http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/17/is-redemption-possible-for-tiger-woods/ (see also the footnotes and comments beneath the article)
This is not present in the case of Barack Obama. Indeed, there is every reason to believe that he is happily married to his wife, Michelle, who is a very strong-willed and talented African-American woman.
Fifth, my favorite golfer for many years has been Vijay Singh, who is “blacker” than Woods and Obama in terms of his skin color. Indeed, my only regret is that Singh has not beaten Woods in their every encounter. If anyone has followed Singh around at tournaments and/or talked with those who know him well, they will realize that he is personable and well-liked, and not arrogant, aloof and unbearingly narcissistic like Woods. Also, the scandals that have surrounded and hounded Woods (e.g., prostitutes, doping)—and have brought shame to him, and hurt the young kids who revered him as a hero—have not blemished Singh.
Sixth, I have very definite and deep-seated substantive, philosophical and political differences with Obama, which I have not been timid or defensive in writing about. I never realized the depth of these differences until I read and analyzed his book, “Dreams from My Father” twice after he was elected in 2008. These differences have become greater, much greater, as his presidency has unfolded.
See, e.g., http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/is-barack-obama-a-racist/ (“Is Barack Obama A Racist?”) and http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/12/03/barack-obama-is-a-lame-duck-president-who-will-not-be-reelected/ (“Barack Obama Is A Lame-Duck President Who Will Not Be Reelected”) (see also the footnotes and all of the comments beneath both articles)
Seventh, some people have suggested that the level of hatred towards Woods would be much less if we did not have a president who is half African-American, and a country with serious economic problems. However, the linkage between Woods and Obama is almost nonexistent. Among other things, Woods’ “accident” in Florida that triggered his “bimbo eruption” and subsequent divorce occurred in late November of 2009, when Obama was still very popular. Indeed, essentially all of the facts about Woods’ prostitutes and bimbos came out while Obama remained popular.
Lastly, I am very proud of the federal housing laws that I authored on behalf of Presidential Medal of Freedom and Congressional Gold Medal recipient and former U.S. Senator Edward W. Brooke (R-Mass). They included the “Brooke Amendment” relating to public housing; and the national “Housing Allowance” program, which morphed into the Section 8 housing program that has helped millions of African-Americans and others.
Brooke was the first African-American to serve in the U.S. Senate following Reconstruction at the end of the American Civil War; Barack Obama was the third. As a young attorney, I staffed Senator Brooke on the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the United States Senate; and I served as chief of staff to the senator during his re-election campaign of 1972.
Also, on behalf of Senator Brooke, I established a summer program for disadvantaged kids in Massachusetts, in conjunction with the Pentagon, which involved underutilized military facilities within the State (e.g., the Boston Navy Yard, Otis Air Force Base) and served approximately 100,000 kids during its first year alone.
See http://www.naegele.com/naegele_resume.html
On most issues, I was politically in tune with Senator Brooke; I am not with Barack Obama at all.
What A Vile Man Barack Obama’s Father Turns Out To Have Been: A Drunken, Wife-Beating, Bribe-Taking Bigamist Of Extreme Arrogance, Who Spent Much Of His Life Propping Up Bars While Bemoaning His Fate And Running Down Rivals
This is one of many conclusions reached about Barack Obama’s father, which appear in the UK Daily Mail’s review of a new book about the father entitled, “The Other Barack” by Sally H. Jacobs.
See http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/books/article-2024819/Barack-Obamas-father-Bigamist-drunk-wife-beater.html
They are consistent with Barack Obama’s own assessment of his father, which are set forth in the article above:
Yet, by doing enormous damage to the American nation and hurting its people, he has done far worse than his father ever did. Indeed, the tragedy continues with Barack Obama in the White House.
The son—America’s narcissistic “Hamlet on the Potomac” and “Jimmy Carter-lite”—grew up in Hawaii and Indonesia, and never set foot on the American mainland until he attended Occidental College in Southern California. Like his father before him, he admitted in his own book, “Dreams from My Father,” that he came close to getting hooked on the illegal drugs he was taking. For example, he wrote: “Junkie. Pothead. That’s where I’d been headed: the final, fatal role of the young would-be black man.”
Obama will not be reelected next year, and instead he will be retreat either to Chicago or Hawaii no later than January of 2013, to lick his political wounds and write his memoirs, and work full time on his presidential library. It cannot happen fast enough, for the good of the United States and the American people!
See http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/12/03/barack-obama-is-a-lame-duck-president-who-will-not-be-reelected/#comment-1778 (see also the article itself, as well as the footnotes and other comments beneath it)
Obama Is A Hypocrite, A Demagogue, and a Raving Unprincipled Narcissist
As the UK’s Financial Times has underscored:
See http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/0e21ea0a-dfe2-11e0-a820-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1YLoV5Mjk; see also http://www.naegele.com/documents/PalestinianOptionsatUNLeadtoLegalThreattoIsraelsMilitary.pdf (“Palestinian Options at U.N. Lead to Legal Threat to Israel’s Military”)
What is clear from this and so many other examples like it is that Obama is a fool, a fad and a feckless naïf, and a tragic Shakespearean figure who will be forgotten and consigned to the dustheap of history—unless he tragically alters the course of American history.
His naïveté is matched by his overarching narcissism; and he is more starry-eyed and “dangerous” than Jimmy Carter. Indeed, it is likely that his presidency will be considered a sad and tragic watershed in history; and the American people are recognizing this more and more with each day that passes.
He must be sent packing either to Chicago or Hawaii not later than January of 2013, to lick his political wounds and write his memoirs, and work full time on his golf scores and his presidential library. It cannot happen fast enough, for the good of the world, the United States and the American people, before he does even more damage!
See also http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/story/2011-09-20/poll-economy-obama/50483094/1?loc=interstitialskip (“Poll: Economic pessimism deepens, and more blame Obama”) and http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2011/09/23/morgan-freeman-obama-has-made-racism-worse-tea-party-will-do-whatever#ixzz1YnWDliVr (“Morgan Freeman: Obama Made Racism Worse”)
Under Barack Obama, Poverty Among Blacks Has Reached Record Levels, At The Very Least Destabilizing The Black Middle Class
Time Magazine has an article by Steven Gray, a Washington Correspondent for the magazine and its former Detroit bureau chief, which is worth reading because of the writer’s apparent disillusionment with Obama.
Among other things, he concluded:
See http://swampland.time.com/2011/10/03/a-tale-of-two-speeches-is-obama-closeting-americas-black-experience/
This article mirrors the writer’s naïveté. Barack Obama is black when it suits him, and white at all other times; and what is happening to the black middle class is happening on his watch. At best, the writer is being charitable.
For openers, look at the number of white male advisers who surround Obama at the White House, and then look for any people of color who hold these very top positions. The name “White” House has defined his presidency since the very beginning . . . and indeed, since the beginning of his runs for elective offices (e.g., David Axelrod, David Plouffe).
Down deep Obama is conflicted. Just read his book, “Dreams from My Father.” It is all there in black and white.
See http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/is-barack-obama-a-racist/
Obama is a racist and a bigot; and he is anti-Israel. Put succinctly, he is a raving narcissist and a demagogue; and he speaks out of all sides of his mouth. He and he alone is the center of his universe.
See http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/12/03/barack-obama-is-a-lame-duck-president-who-will-not-be-reelected/ (see also the footnotes and comments beneath the article)
Barack Obama has been an unmitigated disaster for blacks and whites, which is among the many reasons why his presidency will end no later than January of 2013, when he retreats either to Chicago or Hawaii to lick his political wounds and write his memoirs, and work full time on his golf scores and his presidential library.
It cannot happen fast enough, for the good of the United States and all Americans!
Obama’s Girlfriends Were Boiled Down To One “Composite” In His Book
At least this is the assertion being made today.
See http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2012/05/obama-ny-girlfriend-was-composite-character-122272.html and http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/2012/06/young-barack-obama-in-love-david-maraniss
Where are his friends and former lovers and college classmates and those with whom he smoked pot and took other drugs?
How could he afford to pay for Occidental College in Los Angeles and Columbia University in New York City and his apartments, travels, food to eat, drugs and everything else? Money does not fall out of the sky.
These are among the vast number of unanswered questions about him.
. . .
One interesting comment by Obama, which appears in a letter quoted in the Vanity Fair article cited above:
Some Liberals argue that he has governed like a Republican (e.g., broadening the war in Afghanistan), while conservatives take an entirely opposite position.
OBAMA PLAYS THE RACE CARD
The UK’s Daily Mail has reported:
See http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2122245/Trayvon-Martin-case-George-Zimmermans-father-says-family-persecuted.html (“‘I never foresaw so much hate from the president’: George Zimmerman’s father speaks out on his family’s ‘persecution’ after Trayvon shootings”); see also http://times247.com/articles/new-high-def-video-vindicates-zimmerman-s-account (“New High Def Video Vindicates Zimmerman’s Story”) and http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2128392/Trayvon-Martin-case-Fears-George-Zimmerman-convicted-killing-Florida-teen.html (“Trial by lynch mob? Fears George Zimmerman is ‘already convicted’ in Trayvon Martin’s death as his family says America is ‘out for blood’”)
As I wrote in comments above:
George Zimmerman, who may be half-Jewish, deserves the presumption of innocence that was never afforded to Richard Jewell.
See http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/12/03/barack-obama-is-a-lame-duck-president-who-will-not-be-reelected/#comment-2098 (“Trayvon Martin Protesters Ransack Store”)
Aside from (1) domestic and global economic problems, which will get much worse, and (2) national security issues, which may explode at any time (e.g., the ever-reckless Netanyahu’s attack on Iran, potentially drawing Americans into a wider war in the Middle East—and with 1.5 billion followers of Islam worldwide), the issue of (3) race will be a significant factor in November’s elections.
Obama is trying to play the race card to ignite his political base of black voters. However, Zimmerman is half-Hispanic; and Obama may lose Hispanics in the process.
There are racial tensions between blacks and Hispanics in Florida and other States already. Indeed, race relations between Hispanics—which is the larger American population group—and blacks is potentially a powder keg.
Also, Obama’s actions remind white voters that he is black and a racist—which of course he is, as set forth vividly in his book, “Dreams from My Father,” in his own words.
See http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/is-barack-obama-a-racist/
. . .
Also, it is worth noting:
See http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=50546
Sadly, there are few black leaders who are truly responsible and not exacerbating racial tensions that need to be “cooled” instead of inflamed. Barack Obama, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Maxine Waters, the Congressional Black Caucus and others are fanning racial hatred, not defusing it. More demagogues are not needed; and the media—such as Piers Morgan, a Brit at CNN—is acting irresponsibly.
The real tragedy would occur if White and Hispanic America—and other ethnic and racial groups in the United States, such as Asians—were to turn against Black America in retribution, saying: “Enough is enough.” There are many minorities, not just the one that makes the most noise. Also, no one should ever underestimate the fact that violence begets more violence, which can spin out of control.
Indeed, the words of one commenter from Florida about the ransacking of a North Miami Beach Walgreens store, which I cited above, are worth repeating again:
Compare http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/12/03/barack-obama-is-a-lame-duck-president-who-will-not-be-reelected/#comment-2098 (“Trayvon Martin Protesters Ransack Store“) with http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2012/04/16/Farrakhan-To-Black-College-Students-%20People-Are-Going-To-Kill-Their-Leaders-In-A-Few-Days (“Farrakhan To Black College Students: People Are Going To Kill Their Leaders In A Few Days”); see also http://www2.wkrg.com/news/2012/apr/23/man-beaten-mob-critical-condition-ar-3659891/ (“Man Beaten By Mob, In Critical Condition“) and http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/25/us-usa-florida-shooting-zimmerman-idUSBRE83O18H20120425 (“George Zimmerman: Prelude to a shooting”) and http://hamptonroads.com.nyud.net/2012/05/beating-church-and-brambleton (“100 black teens beat white couple in Norfolk…“) and http://www.wnd.com/2012/05/100-blacks-beat-white-couple-media-buries-attack/ (“100 Blacks Beat White Couple, Media Bury Attack“) and http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2146070/Trayvon-Martin-killing-Teenager-drugs-autopsy-finds.html (“Revealed: Dramatic pictures of Trayvon’s lifeless body from night of shooting as new evidence shows Zimmerman bleeding with ‘broken nose’ and proves teenager had DRUGS in his system when he died”) and http://abcnews.go.com/US/cops-witnesses-back-george-zimmermans-version/story?id=16371852#.T7ZKkXlYsw0 (“Cops, Witnesses Back Up George Zimmerman’s Version of Trayvon Martin Shooting“) and http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/drop-george-zimmerman-murder-charge-article-1.1080161 (Alan Dershowitz: “Drop George Zimmerman’s murder charge . . . New evidence suggests Trayvon Martin’s killer acted in self-defense”)
Barack Obama Is A Total Moron
Charles Krauthammer has written a fine article in the Washington Post entitled, “Did the state make you great?”:
See http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/charles-krauthammer-did-the-state-make-you-great/2012/07/19/gJQAbZOiwW_story.html; see also http://professional.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390443931404577551344018773450.html (“Four Little Words . . . ‘You didn’t build that’”—”[T]he president’s rare moments of candor—on free enterprise, on those who ‘cling to their guns and religion,’ on the need to ‘spread the wealth around’—are so revealing. They are a look at the real man”)
Considering the fact that Obama has never really worked in the private sector a day in his life—except briefly in New York City—he has brass cojones to make the statement set forth in the first Obama quote above. Indeed, as I have written, citing his book, “Dreams from My Father”:
See http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/is-barack-obama-a-racist/
This “spy” named Obama has no idea what most Americans go through to earn a living, much less does he have any true empathy for them. Like most politicians, he is nothing more than an empty suit—an actor, pure and simple.
His knee-jerk, far-Left, socialist “nanny state” ideas are bankrupt, just as he has been bankrupting the United States and the American people. The sooner he is gone from the White House permanently, the better off our great nation will be!
See http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/12/03/barack-obama-is-a-lame-duck-president-who-will-not-be-reelected/ and http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/09/27/the-economic-tsunami-continues-its-relentless-and-unforgiving-advance-globally/#comment-2189 (“Americans’ Wealth Drops 40 Percent, With Much Worse Yet To Come”)
The Emperor’s New Clothes
In Hans Christian Andersen’s wonderful fable “The Emperor’s New Clothes,” two make-believe weavers purport to spin a fine suit of clothes for an emperor, which is made of beautiful material that possesses the wonderful quality of being invisible to any man who is unfit for his office or unpardonably stupid. The potentate and his subjects acknowledge that the garments are very fine indeed. That is, until one little child sees the emperor marching in a procession, and says at last: “But he has nothing on at all”—and the grand swindle is exposed for all to see.
See http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Fairy_tales_of_Andersen_(Paull)/The_Emperor%27s_New_Clothes
Barack Obama is that modern-day “emperor,” and he has been exposed for all to see.
In an article entitled, “When Americans Saw the Real Obama,” the Wall Street Journal‘s Peggy Noonan has written:
See http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204530504578079232194509700.html?mod=WSJ_hps_sections_opinion (emphasis added)
This is a fine article by Noonan, and it is accurate as far as it goes. However, it does not go far enough.
If more Americans had read Barack Obama’s book “Dreams from My Father” before the 2008 elections, they would have realized that he is a racist, a narcissist, and not someone who is truly likable. It is set forth there, in his own words, for all to read.
Read the book if you have any doubts.
I am an Independent; and before the 2008 elections, I considered the idea of voting for Obama and working actively on his campaign. I even had discussions with someone very close to the top about working on Obama’s “housing advisory group,” because of work that I had done in the U.S. Senate.
In the final analysis, I voted for John McCain because of two issues: (1) the economy, and (2) national security matters. And I read Obama’s book twice after the election, to more fully understand what our new president was really like.
The book was a shocker; and my first article that began this blog—which appears above—draws on his own words to describe his core beliefs.
See http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/is-barack-obama-a-racist/
. . .
If Mitt Romney wins the election, which is likely, racial prejudice may increase dramatically. Blacks have said they will riot, which would produce a dramatic backlash on the part of whites; and the post-Obama period in racial relations might be grim. After Obama, who has played the “race card” again and again, and fanned racial and class divisions, it may be a very long time before another black is elected president; and many blacks may feel more alienated than ever.
See http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2223977/Racial-prejudice-increased-51-cent-Americans-Obama-took-office-finds-AP-poll.html (“Racial prejudice has increased to 51 per cent of Americans since Obama took office finds AP poll”); see also http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/is-barack-obama-a-racist/#comment-2149 and http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/12/03/barack-obama-is-a-lame-duck-president-who-will-not-be-reelected/#comment-2282 and http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/12/03/barack-obama-is-a-lame-duck-president-who-will-not-be-reelected/#comment-2101 and http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/is-barack-obama-a-racist/#comment-1782 and http://cnsnews.com/news/article/gallup-obamas-job-approval-drops-7-points-3-days (“Gallup: Obama’s Job Approval Drops 7 Points in 3 Days”—”On Oct. 26, it dropped . . . to 46 percent who said they approved and 49 percent who said they did not“) and http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/biden-theres-never-been-day-last-four-years-ive-been-proud-be-his-vice-president_660130.html (“Biden: ‘There’s Never Been A Day In The Last Four Years I’ve Been Proud To Be His Vice President’“) and http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/us-election/9652764/Mitt-Romney-can-still-win-and-he-deserves-to.html (“This was supposed to be a presidency of great thoughts and ideals. Obama was the big ideas guy: hope, change, the transformation of Washington, and a new post-racial, post-partisan politics. But whenever a moment came to go big, Obama went small”) and http://www.dickmorris.com/prediction-dick-morris-tv-special-election-alert/ (“[P]rediction—a big Romney win!”) and http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/11/05/Obama-closes-to-half-empty-stadium-in-Ohio (“OBAMA ENDS CAMPAIGN IN HALF-EMPTY ARENA“)
But see http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/nov/6/morning-after-reality-no-easy-answers-to-gridlock/ (“Morning-after reality: No easy answers to gridlock”) and http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324894104578103751218075988.html (“Big Bet Six Months Ago Paved Way for President”) and http://www.examiner.com/article/liberals-on-twitter-celebrate-obama-victory-with-profane-racist-tweets (“Liberals on Twitter celebrate Obama victory with profane, racist tweets”) and http://www.dickmorris.com/why-i-was-wrong/#more-10133 (Dick Morris: “Why I Was Wrong”) and http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/charles-krauthammer-the-way-forward/2012/11/08/6592e302-29d8-11e2-96b6-8e6a7524553f_story.html (GOP: “There’s no need for radical change. . . . Romney is a good man who . . . nearly won. He would have made a superb chief executive”)
The question is ” What do you think “. My answer is : A dead rabbit would make a better president than Obama. Give Obama another 4 years, and I think he will finish destroying the United States economically, which was his original plan to begin with.
When Will Obama Fall?
In an article entitled, “With Plea Deal, Jesse Jackson Jr.’s Fall From Grace Seems Complete,” Newsweek‘s John Avlon writes:
See http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/02/08/with-plea-deal-jesse-jackson-jr-s-fall-from-grace-seems-complete.html; see also http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/12/03/barack-obama-is-a-lame-duck-president-who-will-not-be-reelected/#comment-2315 (“Will Obama ‘Unravel’ Like Nixon Did?”) and http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/09/24/washington-is-sick-and-the-american-people-know-it/ (“Washington Is Sick And The American People Know It”)
Barack Obama is an integral part of the same corrupt Chicago culture.
See, e.g., http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/is-barack-obama-a-racist/
When will the Obama “swamp” be drained, and how complete will be his fall from grace?