The Chicken-Hearted Neanderthals In The GOP

14 06 2019

 By Timothy D. Naegele[1]

In an article entitled “Russiagate Is No Watergate,” Pat Buchanan—an adviser to Presidents Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan and Gerald Ford, and a former GOP presidential aspirant himself—has written:

“History is repeating itself, and with a vengeance,” John Dean told the judiciary committee, drawing a parallel between Watergate, which brought down Richard Nixon, and “Russiagate” which has bedeviled Donald Trump.

But what strikes this veteran of Nixon’s White House is not the similarities but the stark differences.

Watergate began with an actual crime, a midnight break-in at the offices of the DNC in June 1972 to wiretap phones and filch files, followed by a cover-up that spread into the inner circles of the White House.

Three years after FBI Director James Comey began the investigation of Trump, however, the final report of his successor, Robert Mueller, found there had been no conspiracy, no collusion and no underlying crime.

How can Trump be guilty of covering up a crime the special counsel says he did not commit?

And the balance of power today in D.C. is not as lopsided as it was in 1973-1974.

During Watergate, Nixon had little support in a city where the elites, the press, the Democratic Congress and the liberal bureaucracy labored in earnest to destroy him. Nixon had few of what Pat Moynihan called “second and third echelons of advocacy.”

Contrast this with Trump, a massive presence on social media, whose tweets, daily interactions with the national press and rallies keep his enemies constantly responding to his attacks rather than making their case.

Trump interrupts their storytelling. And behind Trump is a host of defenders at Fox News and some of the top radio talk show hosts in America.

There are pro-Trump websites that did not exist in Nixon’s time, home to populist and conservative columnists and commentators full of fight.

Leftists may still dominate mainstream media. But their unconcealed hatred of Trump and the one-sided character of their coverage has cost them much of the credibility they had half a century ago.

The media are seen as militant partisans masquerading as journalists.

Consider the respective calendars.

Two years after the Watergate break-in, Nixon was near the end, about to be impeached by the House with conviction possible in the Senate.

Three years into Russiagate, 3 in 4 House Democrats do not want their caucus to take up impeachment. Many of these Democrats, especially moderates from swing districts, do not want to cast a vote to either bring down or exonerate the president.

Assume the House did take up impeachment. Would all the Democrats vote aye? Does anyone think a Republican Senate would deliver the needed 20 votes to provide a two-thirds majority to convict and remove him?

For a Republican Senate to split asunder and vote to expel its own Republican president who is supported by the vast majority of the party would be suicidal. It could cost the GOP both houses of Congress and the White House in 2020. Why would Republicans not prefer to unite and fight to the end, just as Senate Democrats did during the Clinton impeachment?

Trump’s support in the Republican caucus in the Senate today is rock solid. Speaker Nancy Pelosi is herself opposed to impeachment hearings in the House, considering them ruinous to her party’s hopes of maintaining control in 2020.

When Dean went before the Watergate committee of Sen. Sam Ervin in 1973, all five days of his testimony were carried live on ABC, CBS and NBC.

When Dean appeared Monday, the three cable news networks swiftly dropped coverage of the judiciary committee hearings to report on a helicopter crash in mid-Manhattan. Dean’s testimony could be seen on C-SPAN3.

Much of America is bored by the repetitive, nonstop media attacks on Trump, and look on the back-and-forth between left and right not as a “constitutional crisis” but as a savage battle between parties and partisans.

The impeachers who seek to bring down Trump face other problems.

Now that Mueller has spent two years and found no evidence of a Trump-Putin conspiracy to hack the emails of the DNC and Clinton campaign, questions have arisen as to what the evidence was that caused the FBI to launch its unprecedented investigation of a presidential campaign and a newly elected president.

Did an anti-Trump cabal at the apex of the FBI and U.S. security agencies work with foreign intelligence, including former British spy Christopher Steele, to destroy Trump?

The political dynamic of Trump’s taunts and defiance of the demands of committee chairs in a Democratic House, and the clamor for impeachment from the Democratic and media left are certain to produce more calls for hearings.

But if the impeachment hearings come, they will be seen for what they are: An attempted coup to overthrow a president by the losers of 2016 who are fearful they could lose again in 2020 and be out of power for four more years.

Russiagate is not Watergate, but there is this similarity:

Nixon and Trump are both the objects of a truly great hatred.[2]

Some of us lived through Watergate, as Pat Buchanan did.  He was working in the Nixon White House, while I was leaving Capitol Hill and the U.S. Senate for the private practice of law in downtown Washington, D.C.   Today, as in the case of Nixon, the chicken-hearted Neanderthals in the GOP may be Donald Trump’s Achilles’ heel.[3]

The un-American, traitorous, racist, anti-Semite Barack Obama was and is hated by vast swaths of the American people; and he should be in prison today—at the very least—for trying to destroy the Trump candidacy and then presidency.[4]  But none of his true haters tried to destroy either Obama or his presidency.

Indeed, he beat the now-Massachusetts-to-Utah carpetbagger Mitt Romney and his running mate, the RINO Paul Ryan, fair and square.  This may among the reasons why both have opposed President Trump at essentially every juncture. He did what neither of these historical losers could ever do: WIN.  They will be ciphers in American history, if that much.  Like Abraham Lincoln before him, Trump will not be.[5]

Will the future yield “Watergate II,” and will the Trump presidency be destroyed just like the Nixon presidency was?  Traitors like John Dean are being given the time of day; the so-called “mainstream media” is on the warpath again, bent on bringing down this presidency too.  And the spineless, feckless GOP may not support Donald Trump in the final analysis.

But unlike Nixon, Trump has an “army” of true believers, which spans this great nation, except for the bastions of Leftists on our East Coast and “Left coast.”  And as long as our President’s health remains excellent, it is likely that he and his presidency will survive and truly flourish through his second term in office—which will end in January of 2025.

Lots of us certainly hope and pray that this is so.  And yes, many of us began as Democrats, but will never vote for one again—especially in light of the mental midgets of the far-Left who are running against our President.[6]


GOP Establishment Neanderthals


© 2019, Timothy D. Naegele

[1]  Timothy D. Naegele was counsel to the United States Senate’s Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, and chief of staff to Presidential Medal of Freedom and Congressional Gold Medal recipient and former U.S. Senator Edward W. Brooke (R-Mass). He and his firm, Timothy D. Naegele & Associates, specialize in Banking and Financial Institutions Law, Internet Law, Litigation and other matters (see and Timothy D. Naegele Resume-19-4-29). He has an undergraduate degree in economics from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), as well as two law degrees from the School of Law (Boalt Hall), University of California, Berkeley, and from Georgetown University. He served as a Captain in the U.S. Army, assigned to the Defense Intelligence Agency at the Pentagon, where he received the Joint Service Commendation Medal (see, e.g., Mr. Naegele is an Independent politically; and he is listed in Who’s Who in America, Who’s Who in American Law, and Who’s Who in Finance and Business. He has written extensively over the years (see, e.g.,, and can be contacted directly at

[2]  See

[3]  See, e.g.,’_heel (“Achilles’ heel”)

[4]  See, e.g., (“Is Barack Obama A Racist?”) and (“Should Barack Obama Be Executed For Treason?”) and (“The Real Russian Conspiracy: Barack Obama, The Clintons, And The Sale Of America’s Uranium To Russia’s Killer Putin”) and (“DEMOCRATS ARE ANTI-SEMITES”) and (“Edward W. Brooke Is Dead”)

[5]  See, e.g., (“America’s Newest Civil War: 2017 And Beyond”)

[6]  See, e.g., (“The Democrats Are Evil But Smart, While The Republicans Are Neanderthals And Dumb”) and (“The Mueller Report: A Monumental Travesty”) and (“The Mueller Witch Hunt Is Over”) and (“The State Of Our Union, 2019”) and (“It Is Time For Trump Supporters To Fight Back”) and (“The American Left’s Feeding Frenzy”) and (“What Atrocities Did Robert Mueller Commit In Vietnam?”) and (“Robert Mueller Should Be Executed For Treason”) and (“America’s Newest Civil War: 2017 And Beyond”)



5 responses

14 06 2019
H. Craig Bradley


Presidential election cycles are commonly viewed as lasting 8 years (two terms in office). After that, the pendulum usually swings the other direction again. What happens when it does reverse direction? One gifted international economist and historian is Martin A. Armstrong. Here is his forecast on this matter from an investor”s point-of-view. Martin does have history behind him, especially the history of Great Britain, but also the Roman Empire, as well.


From the point of a military historian Homer Lea chronicling the global positioning of Great Britain in 1912 and the changing global scene ( Rising nations of Germany and Japan) we see parallels with a Rising China and similar global circumstances. His book, “Day of the Saxon” is required reading in the U.S. Army War College. So, our commanders are indeed well aware of history and our tendency to repeat it under similar circumstances.

The real long term question is: Can America hold it all together? I seriously doubt it. We have already lost a huge amount of financial and economic ground since 1970. Look at the immigration issue alone for example. When you reflect on it all, that was only “yesterday” as Beetle musician Paul McCartney famously composed.

As far as Mitt Romney, well the Mormons gave fellow Mormon Mitt Romney a job as U.S. Senator from Utah. Mitt took 65% of the vote in a conservative state that NEVER elects Democrats to public office, at least since 1972. Utah is the mirror opposite to Liberal, one party Democratic State of California. We are still a work-in-progress. Utah is becoming more “Liberal” over the past 35 years.

I believe President Obama carried Utah in the 2012 Election. So, we may only have a “few” more years before the United States becomes a one party, Democratic Country like California is today. IF that occurs, there will NEVER be another Trump in the White House in our lifetimes. There won’t ever be another Republican President either. It will be very close, too close to call.


15 06 2019
Timothy D. Naegele

Thank you, Craig, for your comments. They are dire, but nothing is written with certainty.

It is well to remember the negativity of the Jimmy Carter presidency and years. I liked him personally, but did not agree with the direction or trajectory of his presidency. Along came Ronald Reagan, and he turned things upside down.

After eight years of Barack Obama’s racism, anti-Semitism and un-Americanism, the presidency of Donald Trump is a refreshing change. However, the country has been beset with the treasonous conduct of Obama and his fellow co-conspirators, who tried to destroy the candidacy and then the presidency of Trump.

If there is any justice in the United States, Obama, Hillary Clinton and others will be in prison for the world to see.

Hillary behind bars


15 06 2019
Timothy D. Naegele

The Traitor Obama Frolicks In France While His Role In Trying To Destroy Trump Is Investigated

Like the pedophile Roman Polanski—the fugitive from American justice—both are obscenely feted as royalty in France.


Alisha Buaya has reported for the UK’s Daily Mail:

Former US president Barack Obama and his family arrived in Avignon in the south of France for a week’s holiday.

The Obamas are reportedly staying at a luxurious 18th century farmhouse on Bathelasse island, near the Provencal city.

Barack, 57, his wife Michelle, 55, and their two daughters Sasha, 18, and Malia, 20, will relax at the palatial Le Mas des Poiriers, rented at 55,000 euros for the week, according to a report by Le Parisien.

Security detail from the Gard regional police as well as the US Secret Service will surround the residence as the former first family visit the area.

The property sits on 65 acres – providing seclusion and privacy for the Obamas during their stay.

The main house features seven double bedrooms, a family room with large windows that allow for natural light illuminate the lavishly decorated space.

It also has a big farmhouse style kitchen with a large family dining table in the centre.

The former first family could also enjoy a game of tennis or swim laps in the pool, or strolls out on the gardens.

For the past week rumours had been circulating the Obamas might be staying at the magnificent home of former French Formula 1 driver Jean Alesi, high above Villeneuve, AFP reported.

Avignon was the papal seat of the Catholic Church from 1309 to 1377 and can be seen at the medieval Palais des Papes (Pope’s Palace) in the centre of Avignon.

See (“A Presidential week in Provence: Inside the incredible 55,000 Euros-a-night 18th century farmhouse where the Obamas are staying for their family holiday in the south of France“) (emphasis added; video omitted)

Will Obama and Polanski ever truly experience American justice? If not, then it does not exist!

See, e.g., (“Should Barack Obama Be Executed For Treason?”) and (“The Real Russian Conspiracy: Barack Obama, The Clintons, And The Sale Of America’s Uranium To Russia’s Killer Putin”) and (“Is Barack Obama A Racist?”) and (“DEMOCRATS ARE ANTI-SEMITES”)


16 11 2019
H. Craig Bradley

The Fix-It Guy

Senator Mitt Romney has some good ideas but they are politically touchy. None are more controversial than messing with Social Security. He proposed raising the retirement age necessary to receive full benefits beyond the current 67, possibly to 70. That would reduce benefits paid to those who claim benefits early at age 62 under current law.

Something must eventually be done in the next 10 years. This is a further step in the right direction. We know the Demographics already: fewer working age people supporting a flood of Medicare and Social Security eligible baby boomers. More likely Congress will wait until the last minute to change the law but change is coming, as its inevitable.

So, whether Mitt’s plan is the one that eventually is implemented or not or if some other Senator’s proposal is eventually chosen; it really does not much matter. Mitt just wants his name on it, that’s all. Mitt wants some respect. He will have to earn it doing something positive besides impeachment. That won’t cut it.


16 11 2019
Timothy D. Naegele

With all due respect, it is my sincere hope that Romney is driven from the Congress and political life altogether. He and his equally-despicable “soul mate” Paul Ryan are the very worst of the GOP.

Lots of us are ashamed of the fact that we voted for either one of them.

See (“The Despicable Mitt Romney Must Be Driven From The GOP”)

With regard to Social Security, it is the “third rail” of American politics: too hot to touch.


What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: