The American Left’s Feeding Frenzy

20 07 2018

 By Timothy D. Naegele[1]

Like the feeding frenzy of rabid Hyenas, America’s Left has attacked the candidacy and presidency of Donald Trump, and seeks to destroy him.[2]

Lots of us began as Democrats, but will never vote for one again. We have watched as they have attacked nonstop.  They did this to Richard Nixon, and brought down his presidency.  And they tried to do it to Ronald Reagan, but were unsuccessful. Today, he is lionized as one of our greatest presidents.[3]

The United States has never been so divided in modern times, which inures to the benefit of our adversaries. Not since the Vietnam War, and the efforts to remove Nixon, have we witnessed Americans so pitted against each other, and such unbridled hatred in our body politic.  It is not healthy.

Many of us believed that Barack Obama was a mistake; and among other things, he exacerbated racial tensions in the United States.  However, we did not seek his ouster or try to destroy his presidency, regardless of how strongly we felt.[4]  No such restraints apply to America’s Left, much less its radical Left.

They put up a presidential candidate in 2016, Hillary Clinton, who was flawed beyond belief[5]; and they lost the election.  Since then, they have engaged in the most vicious politics possible, including physical attacks against those with whom they disagree, and nonstop harassment.  Any missteps on the part of President Trump, however minor, are seized on and trumpeted by those who hate him.

Most significantly, they have been aided and abetted by America’s Leftist “mainstream” media; and by the “Deep State”—or entrenched governmental holdovers from the Obama Administration, and those who have left but continue their treasonous actions.  Such wrongdoers include but are not limited to Obama; Hillary Clinton and former President Bill Clinton; and former Attorneys General Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch.

Others include Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and former Deputy AG Sally Yates; former FBI Directors Robert Mueller and James Comey; former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper; former CIA Director John Brennan; former National Security Advisor Susan Rice; former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe; Senior Advisor to Obama, Valerie Jarrett; and DOJ/FBI current or former employees such as Peter Strzok, Lisa Page and Andrew Weissmann.[6]




© 2018, Timothy D. Naegele

[1]  Timothy D. Naegele was counsel to the United States Senate’s Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, and chief of staff to Presidential Medal of Freedom and Congressional Gold Medal recipient and former U.S. Senator Edward W. Brooke (R-Mass). He and his firm, Timothy D. Naegele & Associates, specialize in Banking and Financial Institutions Law, Internet Law, Litigation and other matters (see and He has an undergraduate degree in economics from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), as well as two law degrees from the School of Law (Boalt Hall), University of California, Berkeley, and from Georgetown University. He served as a Captain in the U.S. Army, assigned to the Defense Intelligence Agency at the Pentagon, where he received the Joint Service Commendation Medal (see, e.g., Mr. Naegele is an Independent politically; and he is listed in Who’s Who in America, Who’s Who in American Law, and Who’s Who in Finance and Business. He has written extensively over the years (see, e.g.,, and can be contacted directly at

[2]  See, e.g. (“America’s Newest Civil War: 2017 And Beyond”) and (“Robert Mueller Should Be Executed For Treason”) and (“The Department Of Injustice’s Inspector General Is Complicit In The Deep-State Cover-Up!”)

[3]  See (“Ronald Reagan and John F. Kennedy: A Question of Character”) and (“John F. Kennedy: The Most Despicable President In American History”) (see also the extensive comments beneath this article)

[4]  See, e.g. (“Is Barack Obama A Racist?”) and (“Obama In Afghanistan: Doomed From The Start?”) and (“Barack Obama: America’s Second Emperor?”) and (“The End Of Barack Obama”) and (“The Speech—Is Barack Obama Smoking Pot Again?”) and (“Are Afghanistan, Iraq And Pakistan Hopeless, And Is The Spread Of Radical Islam Inevitable, And Is Barack Obama Finished As America’s President?”) and (“Barack Obama Is A Lame-Duck President Who Will Not Be Reelected”) and (“Is Obama The New Nixon?”) and (“Edward W. Brooke Is Dead”) and (“The Obama Great Depression”) and (“The Real Russian Conspiracy: Barack Obama, The Clintons, And The Sale Of America’s Uranium To Russia’s Killer Putin”) and (“Should Barack Obama Be Executed For Treason?”)

[5]  See, e.g. (“Clinton Fatigue”)

[6]  See, e.g., (“One FBI Text Message In Russia Probe That Should Alarm Every American”)



5 responses

22 07 2018
Ron Michaels

On his last day as president Barack Obama PARDONED General James Cartwright (4 Stars) at one point Vice-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. This man has been characterized as Obama’s right-hand man in the White House and a key member of Obama’s national security team. The General had been found guilty of lying to the FBI about the fact he leaked information on Iran’s nuclear program to reporters.

The General is Peter Strzok’s grandfather. Peter is the only person to interview Hillary Clinton, with no recording, on her HRC email investigation.

The father of Peter Strzok was in the Army and a career expert in sanctions and nuclear activity in Iran. His brother, Mark, works for Mammoet. They are the world leader in big cranes with a SPECIALTY in moving nuclear Reactors.

Another brother of Peter Strzok’s father is James Strzok, a Jesuit priest working in Kenya. He also has a solid military career and deep knowledge in energy/resources.

Mariana Strzok is the daughter of General James Cartwright. Mariana’s son, Devin Cartwright Strzok, was in an emergency meeting in the Situation Room in the White House West Wing in May 2015, with his new wife, at 9:45pm.

Just an everyday meeting with the wife, also in the military, (also a Strzok), with Osbaldo Cantu about geospatial technology. Just so happens his uncle, Peter Sttzok, was the last person on earth to see the deleted HRC emails and the last person to see the “missing” server.

The connections to Uranium are many and documented.

Peter Strzok’s wife, Melissa, was promoted to her role as a director in the SEC at the same time the FBI was drafting the exoneration letter for the HRC emails.


22 07 2018
Timothy D. Naegele

Thank you, Ron, for these comments.

See, e.g., (“James Cartwright”) and (“Peter Strzok”) and (“Mammoet”)

If Jeff Sessions, Mueller, et al., were honest, they would pursue Strzok and others, and use Lisa Page to put all of the pieces together—if she knows them.

Needless to say, you have tied together the various pieces of the treasonous “puzzle” better than most so-called “experts.”

Liked by 1 person

24 07 2018
Timothy D. Naegele

Are Paul Ryan And The Neanderthals In the GOP Leading The Party To Crushing Defeats In November? [UPDATED]

Paul Ryan

Many of us will never forget that Ryan could not even carry his own state of Wisconsin for the GOP in 2012, when he was Mitt Romney’s running mate.

He is a divisive force in the party, and should step aside NOW, and let new fresh faces and Trump supporters to lead the party to victory.

On April 11, 2018, he announced that he will not be seeking re-election in November, yet he refuses to resign.

One of the reasons he may be hanging on is to earn lucrative fees as a lobbyist once he leaves the Congress.

Geoff Earle has written for the UK’s Daily Mail:

Speaker of the House Paul Ryan said he thinks President Trump is ‘trolling people’ with the White House threat to remove security clearances from a host of top former intelligence officials who have criticized the president.

Ryan appeared to brush off the matter after White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders said Monday that a handful of critics, including former CIA director John Brennan, could lose their clearances. She accused them of having ‘monetized’ their status.

The hit on Brennan came after the former spy chief said Trump’s performance in Helsinki, Finland with Russian president Vladimir Putin amounted to treason.

‘I think he is trolling people, honestly,’ said Ryan, who is retiring at the end of his term.

‘This is something that’s in the purview of the executive branch, I think some of these people have lost their security clearances, some people keep their clearance that’s something the executive branch deals with,’ Ryan added. ‘That’s not really in our purview,’ he concluded.

Ryan’s dismissal of the issue came after the White House revealed Trump is exploring ways to remove the security clearances of former CIA chief John Brennan, former FBI director James Comey and other Obama era national security officials who have been critical of his administration.

Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul floated the idea and then spoke to Trump about it at the White House Tuesday, he said.

Sanders made the shocking announcement at her briefing on Monday and charged the officials with using their security clearances for political means and financial gain.

Former deputy Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Andrew McCabe, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former Director of the National Security Agency Michael Hayden, and former National Security Advisor Susan Rice are also on the White House list.

‘The president is exploring the mechanisms to remove security clearances because they’ve politicized and in some cases monetized their clearances,’ she said.

‘It’s extremely inappropriate, and the fact that people with security clearances are making baseless charges provides inappropriate legitimacy to accusations with zero evidence,’ she added.

Rice, who served as national security advisor to President George W. Bush, called Trump’s meeting with Putin a ‘historic mistake.’

[Note: the Daily Mail has mistakenly referred to Condoleezza Rice who was Secretary of State and National Security Advisor under George W. Bush, instead of referring to Susan Rice, who was National Security Advisor to Barack Obama. Compare with]

‘It was a historic mistake to allow the president of the United States — not just Donald Trump, but any president, frankly — to sit for two hours without any notetakers, without any aides present, with one of the most adversarial leaders in the world, relative to the United States,’ she told ABC’s ‘This Week’ on Sunday.

It’s unclear what she meant by the monetization accusation. Some of the former officials are contributors to news networks, which pay them for their work. She made the statement as her predecessor, Sean Spicer, is engaged in a promotional book tour.

All of the officials mentioned have been deeply critical of the Trump administration in one way or another.

Benjamin Wittes, editor of the Lawfare blog and a friend of Comey’s, tweeted Monday that he texted the former FBI boss to ask if he even has a clearance that could be revoked. ‘Nope,’ Comey responded, he wrote. ‘.Comey says he was ‘read out’ when he left government as per normal practice,’ Wittes wrote.

‘He even recently declined a temporary clearance from the IG to read the classified annex to the IG’s recent report. He didn’t want to see any classified material lest the president accuse him of leaking it,’ Wittes added.

Asked if the White House was doing this because of their criticism, Sanders responded: ‘I think you are creating your own story there.’

She added: ‘The president doesn’t like the fact that people are politicizing agencies and departments that are specifically meant to not be political and not meant to be monetized off of security clearances.’

Sanders didn’t have details on how the clearance could be removed.

‘As of now we’re exploring the mechanism on those specific names,’ she said.

At least two of the officials — Comey and McCabe — do not currently have clearances, according to The Washington Post.

Comey hasn’t had a security clearance for many months, a source close to him told the paper.

McCabe’s clearance was deactivated when he was fired from the FBI, said his spokesman Melissa Schwartz.

‘Andrew McCabe’s security clearance was deactivated when he was terminated, according to what we were told was FBI policy,’ she wrote on Twitter. ‘You would think the White House would check with the FBI before trying to throw shiny objects to the press corps…’

Sanders was also asked if the White House was politicizing the security clearance issue as they accused the former intel chiefs of doing.

‘The president is [] not making baseless accusations of contact with a foreign government and accusing the president of treasonous activity,’ she responded.

Clapper went on CNN afterward to call the move ‘a petty thing to do.’

‘For political reasons this is a petty way of retribution, I suppose for speaking out against the president which I think on the part of all of us, are borne out of genuine concerns about President Trump,’ he said.

He added: ‘Security clearance has nothing to do with how I or any of us feel about the president. And I don’t get the briefings. I don’t have access to classified information. It’s frankly more of a courtesy that former senior officials get the security clearance. Haven’t had a case of using it. Has no bearing on my regard or lack thereof for President Trump or what he’s doing.’

And Hayden tweeted whether or not he had a clearance would not affect his work.

‘I dont go back for classified briefings. Won’t have any effect on what I say or write,’ he wrote.

While Clapper and Hayden have said their clearance status doesn’t matter, other officials do use their security clearance to perform lucrative consulting work. The threat of losing their status and, therefore, any employment obtained on the contingency of having a clearance, could have a chilling effort on potential critics.

A security clearance requires a security clearance investigation completed within the past 5 years for a Top Secret clearance and 10 years for a Secret clearance, according to the State Department website.

High-level officials also typically keep their clearances for years so they can provide counsel to their successors and be called upon by their advice.

There are 13 guidelines that, if violated, could result in a security clearance being revoked. They include criminal activity, sudden unexplained wealth, helping a foreign government, alcohol or drug addiction, and unauthorized disclosure of classified information.

Any president can classify or declassify information as he see fits. It’s unclear if Trump could simply order the clearances revoked.

Sanders’ announcement follows Republican Senator Rand Paul’s demand that Brennan lose his security clearance.

Brennan has been the most vocal in the wake of Trump’s meeting in Helsinki with Putin.

In a series of tweets, Paul charged the former intelligence chief with making money off his clearance and said he would meet with Trump on Monday to demand it be revoked.

Paul’s office did not respond to’s request for comment.

‘Is John Brennan monetizing his security clearance? Is John Brennan making millions of dollars divulging secrets to the mainstream media with his attacks on @realDonaldTrump?,’ the senator tweeted Monday morning.

He wrote in a later tweet: ‘Today I will meet with the President and I will ask him to revoke John Brennan’s security clearance!’

It’s unclear when that meeting took place but Paul tweeted about it shortly after Sanders’ briefing and appeared to take credit for the White House move.

‘Just got out of WH meeting with @realDonaldTrump. I restated to him what I have said in public: John Brennan and others partisans should have their security clearances revoked,’ he wrote.

He also clarified he didn’t think the officials should get speaking fees or network contracts based on their status.

‘Public officials should not use their security clearances to leverage speaking fees or network talking head fees,’ he wrote on Twitter.

Paul, a maverick GOP senator who does not always have the best relationships with the Republican Party or Trump, has emerged as one of the president’s biggest champions on his meeting with Putin.

He also defended Trump’s criticism of special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation, telling CBS News: ‘The President has gone through a year and a half of totally partisan investigations – what’s he supposed to think?’

The president tweeted his thanks to Paul in return.

Paul plans to travel to Russia in early August on behalf of the administration, according to Politico.

Brennan served as President Barack Obama’s CIA director and left the job in January 2017 after Trump was inaugurated.

Since then he has become one of the president’s harshest critics.

Brennan soundly criticized Trump after his press conference with Putin in Helsinki last week, calling it ‘nothing short of treasonous.’

He also accused the president of being ‘wholly in the pocket of Putin.’

‘Donald Trump’s press conference performance in Helsinki rises to & exceeds the threshold of ‘high crimes & misdemeanors.’ It was nothing short of treasonous. Not only were Trump’s comments imbecilic, he is wholly in the pocket of Putin. Republican Patriots: Where are you???,’ tweeted Brennan.

He was expressing his fury that the president declined to back the U.S. intelligence community’s assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election.

Putin denied Russia had any role in the election.

Trump was asked if he believed his Russian counterpart or his intelligence chiefs. ‘I don’t see any reason why it would be’ Russia, the president said.

‘I have great confidence in my intelligence people,’ he added, ‘but I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today. And what he did is an incredible offer. He offered to have the people working on the case come and work with their investigators with respect to the 12 people. I think that’s an incredible offer.’

The president later clarified his remarks to say he did believe intelligence assessments that Russia meddled in the 2016 contest.

Trump also fired back at Brennan, slamming him in an interview with Fox News Channel’sTucker Carlson.

‘I think Brennan is a very bad guy, and if you look at it, a lot of things happened under his watch,’ Trump told Carlson.

‘I think he’s a very bad person.’

Brennan has not held back in the harsh language he uses to describe the president.

In June op-ed he wrote for The Washington Post, Brennan called Trump a ‘snake-oil salesman’ who has shown ‘mean-spirited, malicious, and highly abnormal behavior.’

Trump fired back then too. He attacked Brennan on Twitter after the op-ed appeared, quoting a former Secret Service agent who appeared on ‘Fox & Friends’ and called Brennan a liar.

Criticism of Trump

John Brennan called the President Trump’s comments in his press conference with Vladimir Putin ‘treasonous.’

Brennan tweeted: ‘Donald Trump’s press conference performance in Helsinki rises to & exceeds the threshold of ‘high crimes & misdemeanors.’ It was nothing short of treasonous. Not only were Trump’s comments imbecilic, he is wholly in the pocket of Putin. Republican Patriots: Where are you???’

James Comey wrote a book ‘A Higher Loyalty’ about his time as FBI director and how Trump fired him. His firing resulted in the special counsel examining whether the president was obstructing the investigation into Russia’s role in the 2016 election.

Comey said of Trump: ‘My impression was he looked exactly like he did on television, except he looked shorter to me than he did on television, but otherwise exactly the same.’

Andrew McCabe, who was fired by the Trump administration, said of his firing: ‘I am being singled out and treated this way because of the role I played, the actions I took, and the events I witnessed in the aftermath of the firing of James Comey.’

James Clapper said in December of Trump and Putin’s relationship that Putin, a former KBG operative ‘knows how to handle an asset, and that’s what he’s doing with the president.’

Michael Hayden responded to a Trump tweet in November attacking CNN and praising Fox News with: ‘If this is who we are or who we are becoming, I have wasted 40 years of my life. Until now it was not possible for me to conceive of an American President capable of such an outrageous assault on truth, a free press or the first amendment.’

Susan Rice denied a report that she used intelligence for political purposes: ‘Absolutely not for any political purposes, to spy, expose, anything.’ She also denied leaking any information about former Trump National Security Adviser Michael Flynn: ‘I leaked nothing to nobody and never have and never would.’

See (“Speaker Paul Ryan says Trump is ‘trolling people’ after White House says Trump is trying to strip Obama’s intelligence chiefs of their security clearance in revenge for making ‘baseless accusations'”) (emphasis added; videos omitted)

Needless to say, Ryan’s position vis-à-vis security clearances is ludicrous. He never served in our military. When I served at the Pentagon as an Army Captain assigned to the Defense Intelligence Agency, I had the highest security clearances. But I was required to relinquish them when I left for the U.S. Senate, where I was attorney with a Senate committee and later headed a senator’s staff.

Why should anyone retain their clearances when they leave government? The simple answer of why they want them is to earn enormous income in their post-government jobs by peddling their influence, just as Ryan will likely be doing.

The gravity of the situation can be best understood when one realizes that a respected national political forecaster predicts that the Democrats may wipe out the GOP majorities in November.

See (“Top political prognosticator says Democrats are favored to wipe out Republican majority“)

Trump supporters—and followers of the #WalkAway and other similar movements—must take this very seriously, and forge ahead to make sure it does not happen.

See (“Dems grapple with Trump’s resilience“)

Ryan, the traitor Robert Mueller and his “Deep State” co-conspirators, the Leftist “mainstream” media, and Neanderthals in the GOP must not be allowed to snatch defeat from the jaws of Donald Trump’s stunning victories since he became our 45th President.

As stated in my article above, the traitors include but are not limited to Barack Obama; Hillary Clinton and former President Bill Clinton; former Attorneys General Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch; Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and former Deputy AG Sally Yates; former FBI Directors Robert Mueller and James Comey; former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper; former CIA Director John Brennan; former National Security Advisor Susan Rice; former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe; Senior Advisor to Obama, Valerie Jarrett; and DOJ/FBI current or former employees such as Peter Strzok, Lisa Page and Andrew Weissmann.

It is a story of corruption and treason, and of how high government officials abused their positions of power to subvert the rule of law and undermine the democratic process.

Each must be prosecuted for treason and other crimes. Nothing less will suffice.

See, e.g., (“America’s Newest Civil War: 2017 And Beyond”) and (“Robert Mueller Should Be Executed For Treason”) and (“The Department Of Injustice’s Inspector General Is Complicit In The Deep-State Cover-Up!”)

Paul Ryan must be driven from the Republican Party, and left with no basis to lobby in Washington or anywhere else. Along with the despicable Democrats—and yes, lots of us began as Democrats but will never vote for one again—Ryan must become persona non grata in American politics.

See, e.g., (“Paul Ryan shoots down Trump’s birthright citizenship plans“)


29 07 2018
Timothy D. Naegele

Maxine Waters Must Be Sent To Prison For The Rest Of Her Life

Black racist Maxine Waters

The Political Insider has reported:

The extraordinarily low-IQed one is back at it.

California Democrat Maxine Waters gave a wide-ranging interview with CNBC Wednesday and urged even more riots against President Trump and anyone who supports him.

Waters claims that any criticism of her intelligence by the President is rooted in racism and not the fact that she is indeed a low-IQ individual.

As if to prove that lack of intellect, she called on Americans to take to the streets screaming and calling for Trump’s head.

“I think he’s dangerous,” she professed, “I don’t know why people take it. I think Americans should be out in the streets screaming to the top of their voice. Do something. Make something happen.”

The people were already in the streets screaming and calling for heads, congresswoman.

You know, the thugs that were outside your office building last week. The ones who accosted a vehicle[,] stole[] the American flag, burned it, chanted “black power,” and then forced a bystander back in his car for the apparent crime of wearing a Navy hat.

Surely you remember.

Waters was the first to take the rhetoric up a notch when she told supporters to harass administration officials in public every chance they get.

“If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd, and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere,” she told her impressionable fans.

In her CNBC interview, Auntie Maxine insisted that the President’s insults towards her are clearly a racist tactic drummed up by . . . you guessed it . . . the Russians!

“A lot of people call it racism,” she said of Trump’s insults. “A lot of people call it– tactics that he has employed that he’s gotten from– the Kremlin, and– Putin, and the way that they handle things.”

Democrats, Trump explained recently, “are really disciples of a very low IQ person, Maxine Waters, and perhaps even worse, Nancy Pelosi.”

Weird that a racist would also lump the very white Nancy Pelosi into that statement and suggest that she might be even dumber.

“I don’t care what he says,” Waters said. “He can do whatever he wants to. I know what I’m going to think about him. I think that this man does not deserve to be the president of the United States. He is one of the most deplorable people I’ve ever encountered in my life.”

“He can call me whatever he wants to,” Waters further railed. “He does not intimidate me, and I’m not gonna stop talking about him.”

She then gave an answer to a question that was on everyone’s mind. One in which she has remained very tight-lipped.

Should Trump be impeached?

“I certainly think that he is eligible for impeachment,” Waters said.

You don’t say . . .

At a eulogy – a eulogy! – she ranted: “I’m gonna say ‘Impeach 45 every day, Impeach 45 every day, Impeach 45 every day!’”

That is her mission, a mission she believes came straight from God himself.

Pretty confident God isn’t interested in people screaming in the streets calling for Trump’s head.

See (“Maxine Waters: People Should Take to the Streets Screaming to Take Down Trump“) (emphasis added; video omitted); see also (“The Consummate Un-American Black Racist And Race Hustler“) and (“Maxine Waters orders MORE public harassment of Trump aides: ‘God is on OUR side!’”) and (“Pelosi Slams Maxine Waters for ‘Unacceptable’ Attack on Trump“) and (“DEMOCRATS ARE ANTI-SEMITES“) and (“The Ugly And Twisted Face Of A Vile Disgusting Black Racist“) and (“Trump attacks Maxine Waters accusing congresswoman of being corrupt“) and (“Urging Violence against Trump Cabinet Sinks Maxine Waters’ Scandal-Plagued Career to a New Low“)

The woman is vile, treasonous, deranged, and an affront to the human race.

Maxine Waters: poverty pimp


27 06 2019
Timothy D. Naegele

The Democrats Are Freaks And Societal Misfits: Who Will Vote For Them? [UPDATED]

Lots of us began as Democrats but will never vote for one again.

The hole they have dug, and keep on digging, is too deep for any of them to climb out of.

Joshua Caplan has written for Breitbart:

As debate moderators Rachel Maddow and Chuck Todd took over Wednesday for the next round of the debate, the 10 candidates on stage were unable to hear the question Todd was trying to ask about the federal government’s role in getting guns off the street.

Following back-and-forth confusion, Todd announced the debate would head to a commercial break.

It wasn’t immediately clear what happened.

President Donald Trump tweeted that debate hosts NBC and MSNBC “should be ashamed of themselves for having such a horrible technical breakdown in the middle of the debate.”

“Truly unprofessional and only worthy of a FAKE NEWS Organization, which they are!” the president added.

He is en route to Osaka, Japan, for the Group of 20 summit.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) is center stage for the debate in Miami as she leads the night’s field in polling. the left-wing lawmaker is flanked by former Rep. Robert Francis “Beto” O’Rourke (D-TX) and Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ). At the far ends are New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio (D) and former Rep. John Delaney (D-MD), who are polling at the bottom of the group.

See (“Democratic Debate: Technical Failures Force NBC to Cut to Commercial“) (emphasis added: Tweets omitted); see also (“The Thread That Runs Through Trump Opponents: Vicious Societal Misfits“)

As the broad array of their misfits continue debating among themselves, Americans are tuning out in ever greater numbers. One wag has said:

Who would waste their time watching this nonsense. I would rather watch paint dry. It is more beneficial.

Another added:

Also, it might be more beneficial to watch nonstop nonsensical commercials on TV (e.g., about the intricacies and nuances of paint drying). 🙂

These are the sentiments across broad swaths of America, where the pygmy debates are being tuned out.


What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: